Comments on: Philip Weiss

By: Johan

Johan — Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:19:11 +0000

The above comments nicely summarize the situation.

There certainly is no such thing as “Likudnik lobby”, but only Zionists – who “lobby”. The last term, of course, being a euphemism for any of a spectrum of “methods”, with familiar a common denominator.

“Alienation of liberal American Jews from the Israeli government” is now a convenient myth. A vast majority of Jews in the U.S. are staunchly behind the Zionist entity of ill repute in Palestine.

By: Links for 19_March_09 « The Centre for Investigative Journalism News Blog

Links for 19_March_09 « The Centre for Investigative Journalism News Blog — Thu, 19 Mar 2009 10:32:03 +0000

[...] (Audio) Anti-War Radio: Scott Horton Interviews Philip Weiss [...]

By: David Stolz

David Stolz — Thu, 19 Mar 2009 06:26:29 +0000

This latest outrage by the Isreali Lobby isplays the raw and octupus-like power of this group.Our grand Republic is obviously Isreali occupied territory.A nation can not be free if a foreign governments loyalists can veto an appointment by that nations duly elected leadership.Wher is the outrage by the flag wavers on the right,or the civil libertarians on the left?They are all controllesd,and coralled.Take note how the Zionist community,seemingly so progressive,finds its staucnhest supporters in these matters in the NeoConservative/Fundementilist GOP alliance! This is right out of Orwell,and the brilliasnt book:IMPERIUM,by Ulick Varange(Francis Paerker Yockey).

By: Al

Al — Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:31:14 +0000

30 years ago not 20, Reza Pahlavi said exactly what Chas Freeman said regarding US and Israei interests.

By: Myron

Myron — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:33:39 +0000

An alternative, “nicer” Israel Lobby (like J Street) can never effectively oppose the right-wing AIPAC Israel lobby.

The nature of the underlying ideology of Zionism is inherently undemocratic and ethnic nationalist. If AIPAC and the rest of the “bad Israel lobby” disappeared, leaving J Street, you can be sure that J Street would quickly morph into something indistinguishable from the old, “bad” Israel lobby.

The only thing that could effectively defeat the Israel lobby would be an “anti-Israel-Lobby lobby”, opposed in principle to preserving this “special relationship” in any form whatsoever.

There is no “nice” way to retain the pursuit of another country’s religious/ethnic nationalist/supremacist dream as an essential tenet of our own foreign policy.

By: robin

robin — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:55:27 +0000

Wishful thinking. The Zioncons and the Zionlibs won with their filthy campaign against Charles Freeman. The Administraton completely caved in. Now Schumer is looking to punish the officials who endorsed Freeman. This clearly means there is no one in the intelligence or military or diplomatic establishment (the Gentile empire builders) who would dare to oppose Israel’s plans to push the US into a war with Iran. Its not a ‘Pyrrhic Victory’ for Israel’s fifth column, which is trying to make a virtue of necessity; it is a resounding defeat for the American people.

By: Chris Baker

Chris Baker — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:35:06 +0000

There is something else that “dies in the sunlight”–a vampire does.

By: Tim T

Tim T — Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:40:00 +0000

It should be called the “Zionist Lobby” to be more specific. The Freeman case is just one piece of evidence to show the pro-Israel stance of US foreign policy. The two-state solution, if it wasn’t stillborn, is now dead. We just haven’t had the funeral yet.