<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: James Bamford</title>
	<atom:link href="http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/04/18/james-bamford-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/04/18/james-bamford-4/</link>
	<description>Interviews of foreign policy experts, writers and activists.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:43:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: shari</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/04/18/james-bamford-4/comment-page-1/#comment-5910</link>
		<dc:creator>shari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=2857#comment-5910</guid>
		<description>My ex husband is a senior executive at NSA - he&#039;s a big deadbeat - violated all the security clearance regs - and nobody did a thing - he ran out on our daughter when she was 7 - 30 years ago 
 
NSA is a crock.  DOD is a bigger crock.  Crooks and liars.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My ex husband is a senior executive at NSA &#8211; he&#039;s a big deadbeat &#8211; violated all the security clearance regs &#8211; and nobody did a thing &#8211; he ran out on our daughter when she was 7 &#8211; 30 years ago </p>
<p>NSA is a crock.  DOD is a bigger crock.  Crooks and liars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty Didier</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/04/18/james-bamford-4/comment-page-1/#comment-4367</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty Didier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=2857#comment-4367</guid>
		<description>Reading the many posts surfaces that on the face of what is being said, this whole thing is a lot of crap!  What many don&#039;t know is that within our Federal Government down to many local areas there is a huge Criminal Political element (Political Mafia) that are running a World Wide Drug Distribution system involving TONS of cocaine and other drugs.  It&#039;s been going on for years.  How I know is because I was in a family for more than 26 years who are directly involved with laundering and actual air distribution of these drugs.  Obama while an attorney directly assisted the family with starting up their air distribution business in Florida in the 90&#039;s according to the family.  How much money is involved?  Chicago alone gets a weekly $100 million dollar shipment that amounts to more than $5Billion per year.  The family I was in should be known as US Drug Lords and there are more who are much larger.

Marty Didier
Northbrook, IL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading the many posts surfaces that on the face of what is being said, this whole thing is a lot of crap!  What many don&#8217;t know is that within our Federal Government down to many local areas there is a huge Criminal Political element (Political Mafia) that are running a World Wide Drug Distribution system involving TONS of cocaine and other drugs.  It&#8217;s been going on for years.  How I know is because I was in a family for more than 26 years who are directly involved with laundering and actual air distribution of these drugs.  Obama while an attorney directly assisted the family with starting up their air distribution business in Florida in the 90&#8242;s according to the family.  How much money is involved?  Chicago alone gets a weekly $100 million dollar shipment that amounts to more than $5Billion per year.  The family I was in should be known as US Drug Lords and there are more who are much larger.</p>
<p>Marty Didier<br />
Northbrook, IL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maryam fritsch</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/04/18/james-bamford-4/comment-page-1/#comment-4364</link>
		<dc:creator>maryam fritsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=2857#comment-4364</guid>
		<description>ALL CONGRESS SWEAR TO SUPPORT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION DURING THEIR INAUGURATION.  THAT WOULD INCLUDE ALL OF THE AMENDMENTS, INCLUDING THE Ist AMENDMENT ON FREEDOM OF SPEECH!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ALL CONGRESS SWEAR TO SUPPORT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION DURING THEIR INAUGURATION.  THAT WOULD INCLUDE ALL OF THE AMENDMENTS, INCLUDING THE Ist AMENDMENT ON FREEDOM OF SPEECH!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/04/18/james-bamford-4/comment-page-1/#comment-4361</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 21:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=2857#comment-4361</guid>
		<description>Maybe I&#039;m looking at this in an overly simple way, but we have a thing now called caller ID.  We can track the location of the source of a call.  I would think that a similar program can determine the other end of the call.  That&#039;s for landlaines and for cell phones there is satellite tracking.  How can they say that they don&#039;t know the location of the source of a phone call?
If the NSA can locate a phone call of someone under investigation within seconds how can they say they don&#039;t know the source and destination of a call unless they are doing a dragnet of calls that is beyond the FISA amendaments.  By saying they don&#039;t know to me is admiting they are acting illegally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I&#8217;m looking at this in an overly simple way, but we have a thing now called caller ID.  We can track the location of the source of a call.  I would think that a similar program can determine the other end of the call.  That&#8217;s for landlaines and for cell phones there is satellite tracking.  How can they say that they don&#8217;t know the location of the source of a phone call?<br />
If the NSA can locate a phone call of someone under investigation within seconds how can they say they don&#8217;t know the source and destination of a call unless they are doing a dragnet of calls that is beyond the FISA amendaments.  By saying they don&#8217;t know to me is admiting they are acting illegally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eCAHNomics</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/04/18/james-bamford-4/comment-page-1/#comment-4357</link>
		<dc:creator>eCAHNomics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=2857#comment-4357</guid>
		<description>Was it the NSA wiretap that was responsible for all the static in this call? 

Anyone have any doubts that the NSA files are thick on members of Congress?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was it the NSA wiretap that was responsible for all the static in this call? </p>
<p>Anyone have any doubts that the NSA files are thick on members of Congress?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

