<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eric Margolis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/06/02/eric-margolis-17/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/06/02/eric-margolis-17/</link>
	<description>Interviews of foreign policy experts, writers and activists.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:05:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everything to Lose &#124; Gwangju News</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/06/02/eric-margolis-17/comment-page-1/#comment-6715</link>
		<dc:creator>Everything to Lose &#124; Gwangju News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=3396#comment-6715</guid>
		<description>[...] the U.S. would never have invaded. In this sense, as Margolis said to Scott Horton on antiwar.com  radio, the DPRK did what was, in their view, the right thing given the unwillingness of the U.S. to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the U.S. would never have invaded. In this sense, as Margolis said to Scott Horton on antiwar.com  radio, the DPRK did what was, in their view, the right thing given the unwillingness of the U.S. to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan__Idaho</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/06/02/eric-margolis-17/comment-page-1/#comment-5001</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan__Idaho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 19:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=3396#comment-5001</guid>
		<description>I would have no problem seeing 2-3 US aircraft carrier groups sunk. That would be one third of the United Snake&#039;s &quot;foreign policy&quot; eradicated in one fell swoop.

Qui bono?

The WORLD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have no problem seeing 2-3 US aircraft carrier groups sunk. That would be one third of the United Snake&#8217;s &#8220;foreign policy&#8221; eradicated in one fell swoop.</p>
<p>Qui bono?</p>
<p>The WORLD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

