Comments on: Gareth Porter http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/10/07/gareth-porter-67/ Interviews of foreign policy experts, writers and activists. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:43:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Glenn http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/10/07/gareth-porter-67/comment-page-1/#comment-6541 Glenn Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:53:02 +0000 http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=4043#comment-6541 Just heard today the U.S. Government bombed the moon...sponsored by the Federal Reserve and unsound money. If Iran develops the capability to produce nuclear weapons, it will turn out the U.S. Government helped or the information and resources are available on the international market. Just heard today the U.S. Government bombed the moon…sponsored by the Federal Reserve and unsound money.

If Iran develops the capability to produce nuclear weapons, it will turn out the U.S. Government helped or the information and resources are available on the international market.

]]> By: Alex http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/10/07/gareth-porter-67/comment-page-1/#comment-6527 Alex Fri, 09 Oct 2009 03:28:38 +0000 http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=4043#comment-6527 I feel there are two other reasons why Israel wants to bomb Iran. Firstly Israel believes itself to be the Middle East’s one and only superpower and as a consequence any and all ineffective or effective resistance to this situation must be punished. Secondly and possibly more importantly is regional economic and military competition. If we look back over Israel’s offensive history we see that any country in the region that seems to be rising out of economic depression is attacked and its infrastructure is destroyed. Of course Arab countries with pliant dictators such as Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Jordan are no problem for Israel but Lebanon, Iraq and Iran on the other hand have maintained their staunch resistance to Israeli tyranny and so must be regressed militarily or economically or both. I feel there are two other reasons why Israel wants to bomb Iran. Firstly Israel believes itself to be the Middle East’s one and only superpower and as a consequence any and all ineffective or effective resistance to this situation must be punished. Secondly and possibly more importantly is regional economic and military competition. If we look back over Israel’s offensive history we see that any country in the region that seems to be rising out of economic depression is attacked and its infrastructure is destroyed. Of course Arab countries with pliant dictators such as Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Jordan are no problem for Israel but Lebanon, Iraq and Iran on the other hand have maintained their staunch resistance to Israeli tyranny and so must be regressed militarily or economically or both.

]]> By: Alex http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/10/07/gareth-porter-67/comment-page-1/#comment-6520 Alex Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:27:07 +0000 http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=4043#comment-6520 In the Sibel Edmunds recent article in the American Conservative and other interviews, she indicates that the Turks (and indirecty the Israelis) supposedly have reporters at the New York Times, who will receive articles written for them by a foreign entity. The reporter then submits the article (unedited) to the NYT as their own. When Gareth and Scott criticize NYT reporters for being overly biased about Iranian nuclear secrets, it seems that these reporters are part of that system. In the Sibel Edmunds recent article in the American Conservative and other interviews, she indicates that the Turks (and indirecty the Israelis) supposedly have reporters at the New York Times, who will receive articles written for them by a foreign entity. The reporter then submits the article (unedited) to the NYT as their own.
When Gareth and Scott criticize NYT reporters for being overly biased about Iranian nuclear secrets, it seems that these reporters are part of that system.

]]> By: Claus-Erik Hamle http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/10/07/gareth-porter-67/comment-page-1/#comment-6503 Claus-Erik Hamle Thu, 08 Oct 2009 10:22:39 +0000 http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=4043#comment-6503 Once again-on September 16th-the 16 US Intelligence Agencies stated that Iran is not developing nuclear weapons. But the President knows better than his own Intelligence Agencies. So, is President Obama mad, crazy, bonkers, insane, nuts - or what´s going on ? Once again-on September 16th-the 16 US Intelligence Agencies stated that Iran is not developing nuclear weapons. But the President knows better than his own Intelligence Agencies. So, is President Obama mad, crazy, bonkers, insane, nuts – or what´s going on ?

]]>