Comments on: Martin Smith

By: deltafarce

deltafarce — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 06:11:55 +0000

i think that these areas controlled by muslim groups are not backing down because they understand that the conquest of the americas by europe was against virtually defenseless and scattered and disunited primitive tribes, albeit with no shortage of clever indigenous people. this is not true of the muslim regions. they are organized much better and have had serious weapons for a long time. that is, they are no pushover. and this is not going to be a picnic, this coercion of resources for an expansive and expensive empire or this genocide for control of a patch of the planet.
what i am saying is bin laden does not think of bankrupting us – only forcing us to rethink committing genocide with the whole world watching thanks to the modern media. the muslims themselves only want israel to fade into obscurity in the politics of the asian arena. that would in fact happen if israel was swamped by muslim votes. instead the muslim card in asian affairs would be important.

By: Harack

Harack — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 03:53:01 +0000

James oniel shoul get his own blog, the only problem is no one would visit it because he is a retarded asshole cook. why dont you just kill yourself or get a fucking life gezzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

By: James O'Neill

James O'Neill — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 02:46:56 +0000

Davidspero puts his finger on the nub. The Afghanistan discussion is still being guided by Scott as though the evidence garnered over the past eight years simpply doesn't exist. For goodness sake, do some reading. The decision to attack Afghanistan was made BEFORE 9/11. There is no hard evidence that bin Laden was involved: just ask the FBI, they don't think so. Bin Laden in all overwhelming probability died in December 2001. Look at where all the American bases are being built: right along the pipeline's intended route. This occupation has always been about three things: (1) "containing" (i.e. ultimately attacking, China; (2) control of the pipeline routes from the "stans" to the north without having to go through Iran; and (3) control of the heroin which finances CIA black ops and helps keep US banks afloat as the billions are laundered via the so-called Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus.
Repeating ad nauseum the hoary myth that "al quaeda" attacked the US on 9/11 simply obscures the real truth which is obvious to those who bother to look and use their brains to anayse what they then see.

By: Claus-Erik Hamle

Claus-Erik Hamle — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:16:34 +0000

Please give us information on antiwar concerning the Advanced Second Strike Capability which Obama will deploy at sea (and in the Balkans?).

By: andy

andy — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:34:38 +0000

Two words for Afghanistan- get out.

By: Mike E

Mike E — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:05:26 +0000

No, I was simply getting him to explain that those mountains can't be invaded so it's not an excuse at all. Same as always.

By: DavidSpero

DavidSpero — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:08:15 +0000

Scott's STILL caught up in this "get rid of bin Laden to end the excuse for war" idea. The warmakers do not want to end the excuse for war. In fact, bin Laden is most likely dead already, but he is kept alive in the virtual world, like Goldstein in Orwell's 1984.