Comments on: Eric Margolis http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/10/30/eric-margolis-23/ Interviews of foreign policy experts, writers and activists. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:05:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Ben http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/10/30/eric-margolis-23/comment-page-1/#comment-7050 Ben Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:15:10 +0000 http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=4233#comment-7050 All three... All three…

]]> By: oly_demon http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/10/30/eric-margolis-23/comment-page-1/#comment-7007 oly_demon Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:19:28 +0000 http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=4233#comment-7007 Claus: I was replying to "A Patriot" who was saying that not believing 4000gal of fuel traveling at 600 mph took down the buildings (including WTC7) makes us retarded or subversive. Meanwhile the FEMA and NIST reports cant even conclude that this theory is solid. I guess my slight sarcasm wasn't clear there. Ive watched most of the Neils Harrit videos and have even been to a Richard Gage presentation and dont believe the Official fable, so, I guess I'm either a retard or subvert or both (Subvertarded?) Claus:

I was replying to "A Patriot" who was saying that not believing 4000gal of fuel traveling at 600 mph took down the buildings (including WTC7) makes us retarded or subversive. Meanwhile the FEMA and NIST reports cant even conclude that this theory is solid. I guess my slight sarcasm wasn't clear there.

Ive watched most of the Neils Harrit videos and have even been to a Richard Gage presentation and dont believe the Official fable, so, I guess I'm either a retard or subvert or both (Subvertarded?)

]]> By: Claus-Erik Hamle http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/10/30/eric-margolis-23/comment-page-1/#comment-6996 Claus-Erik Hamle Sat, 07 Nov 2009 07:14:04 +0000 http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=4233#comment-6996 The real problem, however, is this: According to former Trident missile engineer Bob Aldridge-<a href="http://www.plrc.org-the" target="_blank">www.plrc.org-the</a> Pentagon aims to achieve a disarming and unanswerable first-strike capability. Minuteman-3 and Trident-2 D5 linked to NAVSTAR obtain a CEP of 30-40 metres, enough to destroy any hard target. And according to Bob Aldridge the US Navy can track and destroy all enemy submarines simultaneously. Even if the Pentagon´s First-Strike Capability is only for blackmail, the Russians may have no choice but implementing Launch On Warning. Bob Aldridge resigned because a disarming and unanswerable first-strike capability is suicidal. I hope you agree that the Pentagon´s aim to achieve Nuclear Supremacy is the most urgent problem because it leads to a more or less automatic Launch On Warning. Nuclear Winter is the most likely result. The Pentagon´s doctrine of First-Strike Capability is suicidal. Some studies on this subject are: The Counterforce Syndrome and Nuclear Empire by Robert C. Aldridge. The real problem, however, is this:
According to former Trident missile engineer Bob Aldridge-http://www.plrc.org-the Pentagon aims to achieve a disarming and unanswerable first-strike capability. Minuteman-3 and Trident-2 D5 linked to NAVSTAR obtain a CEP of 30-40 metres, enough to destroy any hard target. And according to Bob Aldridge the US Navy can track and destroy all enemy submarines simultaneously. Even if the Pentagon´s First-Strike Capability is only for blackmail, the Russians may have no choice but implementing Launch On Warning. Bob Aldridge resigned because a disarming and unanswerable first-strike capability is suicidal.
I hope you agree that the Pentagon´s aim to achieve Nuclear Supremacy is the most urgent problem because it leads to a more or less automatic Launch On Warning. Nuclear Winter is the most likely result. The Pentagon´s doctrine of First-Strike Capability is suicidal. Some studies on this subject are: The Counterforce Syndrome and Nuclear Empire by Robert C. Aldridge.

]]> By: Claus-Erik Hamle http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/10/30/eric-margolis-23/comment-page-1/#comment-6995 Claus-Erik Hamle Sat, 07 Nov 2009 06:46:19 +0000 http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=4233#comment-6995 Oly-demon: A group of 9 scientists, one of them Niels Harrit from the Uni of Copenhagen, have examined some of the dust from WTC for almost two years and concluded that 10-100 tons of nano-thermite was placed in the buildings. He was interviewed on Danish TV 2. The 9 scientists made a research paper on their findings. Oly-demon: A group of 9 scientists, one of them Niels Harrit from the Uni of Copenhagen, have examined some of the dust from WTC for almost two years and concluded that 10-100 tons of nano-thermite was placed in the buildings. He was interviewed on Danish TV 2. The 9 scientists made a research paper on their findings.

]]> By: Claus-Erik Hamle http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/10/30/eric-margolis-23/comment-page-1/#comment-6994 Claus-Erik Hamle Sat, 07 Nov 2009 06:31:47 +0000 http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=4233#comment-6994 According to former Trident missile engineer Bob Aldridge-<a href="http://www.plrc.org-the" target="_blank">www.plrc.org-the</a> Pentagon aims to achieve a disarming and unanswerable first-strike capability. Minuteman-3 and Trident-2 D5 linked to NAVSTAR obtain a CEP of 30-40 metres, enough to destroy any hard target. And according to Bob Aldridge the US Navy can track and destroy all enemy submarines simultaneously. Even if the Pentagon´s First-Strike Capability is only for blackmail, the Russians may have no choice but implementing Launch On Warning. Bob Aldridge resigned because a disarming and unanswerable first-strike capability is suicidal. I hope you agree that the Pentagon´s aim to achieve Nuclear Supremacy is the most urgent problem because it leads to Launch On Warning. Don´t they believe in Nuclear Winter in the Pentagon ? Brigadier Harbottle suggested that they didn´t and called them "bloody fools" for that reason. According to former Trident missile engineer Bob Aldridge-http://www.plrc.org-the Pentagon aims to achieve a disarming and unanswerable first-strike capability. Minuteman-3 and Trident-2 D5 linked to NAVSTAR obtain a CEP of 30-40 metres, enough to destroy any hard target. And according to Bob Aldridge the US Navy can track and destroy all enemy submarines simultaneously. Even if the Pentagon´s First-Strike Capability is only for blackmail, the Russians may have no choice but implementing Launch On Warning. Bob Aldridge resigned because a disarming and unanswerable first-strike capability is suicidal.
I hope you agree that the Pentagon´s aim to achieve Nuclear Supremacy is the most urgent problem because it leads to Launch On Warning.
Don´t they believe in Nuclear Winter in the Pentagon ? Brigadier Harbottle suggested that they didn´t and called them "bloody fools" for that reason.

]]> By: Claus-Erik Hamle http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/10/30/eric-margolis-23/comment-page-1/#comment-6993 Claus-Erik Hamle Sat, 07 Nov 2009 06:13:26 +0000 http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=4233#comment-6993 Oly_demon: A group of 9 scientists, one of them Niels Harrit from Uni of Copenhagen, have examined some of the dust from WTC for almost two years and concluded that 10-100 tons of nano-thermite was placed in the buildings. That´s a fact. Science is science. Oly_demon: A group of 9 scientists, one of them Niels Harrit from Uni of Copenhagen, have examined some of the dust from WTC for almost two years and concluded that 10-100 tons of nano-thermite was placed in the buildings. That´s a fact. Science is science.

]]> By: Dennis Spain http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/10/30/eric-margolis-23/comment-page-1/#comment-6989 Dennis Spain Fri, 06 Nov 2009 05:01:51 +0000 http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=4233#comment-6989 Thank you, I never really thought about that. It seems obvious and very significant. Both buildings as well. Thank you, I never really thought about that. It seems obvious and very significant. Both buildings as well.

]]> By: Hacklheber http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/10/30/eric-margolis-23/comment-page-1/#comment-6982 Hacklheber Wed, 04 Nov 2009 20:38:09 +0000 http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=4233#comment-6982 You can still change to structural engineering at MIT then... You can still change to structural engineering at MIT then…

]]> By: DavidSpero http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/10/30/eric-margolis-23/comment-page-1/#comment-6971 DavidSpero Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:23:00 +0000 http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=4233#comment-6971 Let Scott believe what he wants about 9/11. It's a good show anyway. I wish he'd just leave it alone, though. Let Scott believe what he wants about 9/11. It's a good show anyway. I wish he'd just leave it alone, though.

]]> By: Ben http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/10/30/eric-margolis-23/comment-page-1/#comment-6970 Ben Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:43:55 +0000 http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=4233#comment-6970 I'd be willing to grant that, but I would not be willing to grant that asymmetrical damage can cause global simultaneous symmetrical collapse. But I'm just studying architecture at Harvard, what do I know? I'd be willing to grant that, but I would not be willing to grant that asymmetrical damage can cause global simultaneous symmetrical collapse. But I'm just studying architecture at Harvard, what do I know?

]]>