Scott Horton Interviews Will Grigg

Scott Horton, March 31, 2010

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Will Grigg, author of Liberty in Eclipse, discusses the federal crackdown on the Michigan “Christian militia,” the fundamentally anti-American nature of sedition laws, the domestic origins of ostensibly military tactics like “clear and hold” and why anything resembling a militia is likely to be infiltrated with informants and agent provocateurs.

MP3 here. (31:42)

Will Grigg writes the blog Pro Libertate, hosts a show on the Liberty News Radio Network and is the author of Liberty in Eclipse.

10 Responses to “Will Grigg”

  1. Tweets that mention Will Grigg « Antiwar Radio with Scott Horton and Charles Goyette -- Topsy.com
    March 31st, 2010 at 11:06 am

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by AngelaKeaton. AngelaKeaton said: Antiwar Radio Will Grigg: Will Grigg, author of Liberty in Eclipse, discusses the federal crackdown on the Mich… http://bit.ly/bczEi6 [...]

  2. AUDIO: Scott Horton Interviews Will Grigg « Patrick J. Buchanan
    March 31st, 2010 at 7:45 pm

    [...] Scott Horton Interviews Will Grigg At AntiWarRadio.com [The Best Radio Show on the Planet!] Will Grigg, author of Liberty in Eclipse, discusses the [...]

  3. Orville H. Larson
    March 31st, 2010 at 10:52 pm

    Good man, Grigg. He’s an indefatigable chronicler of police lies, police crimes, and police abuse.

    Anything the U.S. Government says must be regarded with grave skepticism. Sorry, but that’s just the kind of government we’re living under.

  4. DavidSpero
    April 1st, 2010 at 4:52 pm

    Asking all Leftists who read this site to contact Rachel Maddow and Olbermann to complain about their coverage of this government frame-up. Ask them if they remember what was done to the Black Panthers in the 60s and 70s.

  5. Connestee
    April 2nd, 2010 at 4:02 pm

    Rachel and Keith are to the liberals what Rush and Bill O are to the conservatives. They both believe in the police state to maintain the status quo. I know Orwell had hopes this would not happen if people woke up, but they haven't, and it has.

  6. Attack the System » Blog Archive » Updated News Digest April 2-4, 2010
    April 2nd, 2010 at 8:55 am

    [...] The Militia and the Police State William Norman Grigg interviewed by Scott Horton [...]

  7. Ray
    April 2nd, 2010 at 10:27 pm

    Any and every person in the U.S. who conspires to bring down the government through force or violence or plans to provoke a kind of anarchy should be destroyed by any means at all. If a FED sneaks into a group and talks one of it's members into these acts, then they deserve what they get. If a FED agent can convince them do this shit, so can anyone else who really does have the goals of hurting us. Un less the FEDS literally put a gun to their heads and forced them at gunpoint to do this crap then they have no excuses. Saying they were egged on or pressured into is bullshit. It comes down to their own choices, they in the end make the decision to go ahead with this crap – no one else. If the CIA or FBI can approach you and talk you into doing acts of violence against the U.S., you obviously would do the same if approached by a foreign agent and if giving the opportunity, you would follow through with it.. Every one of these groups should be infiltrated and if any person or group has plans like that, they should be tried in court and if found guilty, executed publicly for all to see and to serve as a warning to the other fruit cakes who think this shite is ok..

    I hope the FEDS are watching these groups real close

  8. Jim
    April 3rd, 2010 at 6:46 am

    Anad then Sean Hannity said Tea Partiers were "Tim McVeigh wannabes" and the Fox studio audience applauded. Where's the liberal conspiracy in that?

  9. MoT
    April 5th, 2010 at 5:04 pm

    I would think the Feds have too much time, apparently, and too much of our money, definitely, to be setting people up. They're the "instigators" and usually the most vocal about putting violence into play so why aren't they arresting themselves? Ahhhh… that would be letting the lying cat out of the invisible bag. Agent Provocateurs the lot of them.

  10. patrick
    April 15th, 2010 at 6:22 pm

    Ray: why should "Every one of these groups be infiltrated"? You favor a police-state?

Leave a Reply