Scott Horton Interviews Chris Hellman

Scott Horton, August 16, 2011

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Chris Hellman, Senior Research Analyst for the National Priorities Project, discusses his article “How Safe Are You? What Almost $8 Trillion in National Security Spending Bought You” at tomdispatch.com; how cutting projected DoD spending increases could solve future government spending cuts mandated by the recent debt ceiling compromise; why the homeland security industry needs to hype terrorism threats to justify hefty budgets in a time of austerity; why casual readers of Antiwar.com know more about foreign policy than nearly everyone in Congress; and the F-22 “mafia” that greased palms and twisted arms until the project was green-lighted.

MP3 here. (19:51)

Chris Hellman is Senior Research Analyst for the National Priorities Project.

Chris joined NPP after serving as a military policy analyst for the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation where his work focused on national security spending, military planning and policy, base closures, major weapons systems, trends in the defense industry, global military spending, and homeland security. Prior to joining the Center, Chris spent six years as a Senior Research Analyst at the Center for Defense Information. He also worked for two years as a military budget specialist at Physicians for Social Responsibility. Previously, Chris spent ten years on Capitol Hill as a congressional staffer working on national security and foreign policy issues. He is a frequent media commentator on military planning, policy, and budgetary issues and is the author of numerous reports and articles. He holds a Bachelors Degree from Middlebury College in Vermont.

5 Responses to “Chris Hellman”

  1. How much have we spend on all the wars total, including the "War on Drugs"? How much money has uncle sam spent on things prefixed with the word "War"?

  2. It was like American had two choices: space colonization or various 1984-style "wars" with no end. The Fed had so much wealth it had to go somewhere.

    Right now in some alternative time line, news reports from the Moon are normal, marijuana is taxed and bin Laden went back to the construction business after a brief youthful flirtation with radical Islam.

    …but that's not the time line we are in.

  3. "The Fed had so much wealth it had to go somewhere."

    Fiat Money is not Wealth.

    Precisely.

  4. Bleeding is a secret weapon only friends can help you bleed that much
    USA needs to re-examine its frienship with some countries that claim that USA values are the same as theirs.

  5. All based on the 911 inside job lie.

Leave a Reply