Which country is the rogue nation? Iraq? Iran?
Or the United States? Syndicated columnist Charley Reese asks this question
in a recently published
Reese notes that it is the U.S. that routinely commits "acts of aggression
around the globe." The U.S. government has no qualms about dropping bombs
on civilians, whether they be in Serbia, the Middle East, or Africa. It is
all in a good cause our cause.
This slaughtering of foreigners doesn't seem to bother the American public.
Americans take it for granted that Americans are superior and that American
purposes, whatever they be, take precedence over the rights of other people
to life and to a political existence independent of American hegemony.
The Bush regime has come up with a preemption doctrine that justifies attacking
a country in order to prevent the country from possibly becoming a future threat
to the U.S. "Threat" is broadly defined. It appears to mean the ability
to withstand the imposition of U.S. hegemony. This insane doctrine justifies
attacking China and Russia, a direction in which the Republican presidential
candidate John McCain seems to lean.
The callousness of Americans toward the lives of other peoples is stunning.
How many Christian churches ask God's forgiveness for having been rushed into
an error that has killed, maimed, or displaced a quarter of the Iraqi population?
How many Christian churches ask God to give better guidance to our government
so that it does not repeat the error and crime by attacking Iran?
The indifference of Americans to others flows from "American exceptionalism,"
the belief that Americans are graced with a special mission to impose their
virtue on the rest of the world. Like the French revolutionaries, Americans
don't seem to care how many people they kill in the process of spreading their
American exceptionalism has swelled Americans' heads, filling them with hubris
and self-righteousness and making Americans believe that they are the salt
of the earth.
Three recent books are good antidotes for this unjustified self-esteem. One
is Patrick J. Buchanan's Churchill,
Hitler, and the Unnecessary War. Another is After
the Reich: The Brutal History of the Allied Occupation by Giles MacDonogh,
and a third is John Pilger's Freedom
Buchanan's latest book is by far his best. It is spellbinding from his opening
sentence: "All about us we can see clearly now that the West is passing
away." As the pages turn, the comfortable myths, produced by history written
by the victors, are swept aside. The veil is lifted to reveal the true faces
of British and American exceptionalism: stupidity and deceit.
Buchanan's strength is that he lets the story be told by Britain's greatest
20th-century historians and the memoirs of the participants in the events that
destroyed the West's dominance and moral character. Buchanan's contribution
is to assemble the collective judgment of a hundred historians.
As I read the tale, it is a story of hubris destroying judgment and substituting
in its place blunder and miscalculation. Both world wars began when England,
for no sound or sensible reason, declared war on Germany. Winston Churchill
was a prime instigator of both wars. He seems to have been a person who needed
a war stage in order to be a "great man."
The American President Woodrow Wilson shares responsibility with Britain
and France for the Versailles Treaty, which dismembered Germany, stripping
her of territory and putting millions of Germans under foreign rule, and imposed
reparations that Britain's greatest economist, John Maynard Keynes, correctly
predicted to be unrealistic. All of this was done in violation of assurances
given to Germany that there would be no reparations or boundary changes. Once
Germany surrendered, the assurances were withdrawn, and a starvation blockade
forced German submission to the new harsh terms.
Hitler's program was to put Germany back together. He was succeeding without
war until Churchill provoked Chamberlain into an insane act. Danzig was 95
percent German. It had been given to Poland by the Versailles Treaty. Hitler
was negotiating its return and offered in exchange a guarantee of Poland's
frontiers. The Polish colonels, assessing the relative strengths of Poland
and Germany, understood that a deal was better than a war. But suddenly, the
British Prime Minister issued Poland a guarantee of its existing territory,
including Danzig, whose inhabitants wished to return to Germany.
Buchanan produces one historian after another to testify that British miscalculations
and blunders, culminating in Chamberlain's worthless and provocative "guarantee"
to Poland, brought the West into a war that Hitler did not want, a war that
destroyed the British Empire and left Britain a dependency of America, a war
that delivered Poland, a chunk of Germany, all of Eastern Europe, and the Baltic
states to Joseph Stalin, a war that left the Western allies with a 45-year
cold war against the nuclear-armed Soviet Union.
People resist the shattering of their illusions, and many are angry with
Buchanan for assembling the facts of the case that distinguished historians
Churchill admirers are outraged that their hero is revealed as the first
war criminal of World War II. It was Churchill who initiated the policy of
terror bombing civilians in noncombatant areas. Buchanan quotes B.H. Liddell
Hart: "When Mr. Churchill came into power, one of the first decisions
of his government was to extend bombing to the noncombatant area."
In holding Churchill to account, Buchanan makes no apologies for Hitler,
but the ease with which Churchill set aside moral considerations is discomforting.
Buchanan documents that Churchill's plan was to destroy 50 percent of German
homes. Churchill also had plans for using chemical and biological warfare against
German civilians. In 2001 the Glasgow Sunday Herald reported Churchill's
plan to drop 5 million anthrax cakes onto German pastures in order to poison
the cattle and through them the people. Churchill instructed the RAF to consider
drenching "the cities of the Ruhr and many other cities in Germany"
with poison gas "in such a way that most of the population would be requiring
constant medical attention."
"It is absurd to consider morality on this topic," the great man
Paul Johnson, a favorite historian of conservatives, notes that Churchill's
policy of terror bombing civilians was "approved in cabinet, endorsed
by parliament and, so far as can be judged, enthusiastically backed by the
bulk of the British people." Thus, the terror bombing of civilians, which
"marked a critical stage in the moral declension of humanity in our times,"
fulfilled "all the conditions of the process of consent in a democracy
British historian F.J.P. Veale concluded that Churchill's policy of indiscriminate
bombing of civilians caused an unprecedented "reversion to primary and
total warfare" associated with "Sennacherib, Genghis Khan, and Tamerlane."
The Americans were quick to follow Churchill's lead. Gen. Curtis LeMay boasted
of his raid on Tokyo: "We scorched and boiled and baked to death more
people in Tokyo that night of March 9-10 than went up in vapor in Hiroshima
and Nagasaki combined."
MacDonogh's book, After the Reich, dispels the comfortable myth of
generous allied treatment of defeated Germany. Having discarded all moral scruples,
the allies fell upon the vanquished country with brutal occupation. Hundreds
of thousands of women raped; hundreds of thousands of Germans died in deportations;
a million German prisoners of war died in captivity.
MacDonogh calculates that 2.5 million Germans died between the liberation
of Vienna and the Berlin airlift.
Nigel Jones writes in the conservative London Sunday Telegraph: "MacDonogh
has told a very inconvenient truth," a story long "cloaked in silence
since telling it suited no one."
The hypocrisy of the Nuremberg trials is that the victors were also guilty
of crimes for which the vanquished were punished. The purpose of the trials
was to demonize the defeated in order to divert attention from the allies'
own war crimes. The trials had little to do with justice.
In Freedom Next Time, Pilger shows the complete self-absorption of
American, British, and Israeli governments whose policies are unimpeded by
any moral principle.
Pilger documents the demise of the inhabitants of Diego Garcia. The Americans
wanted Diego Garcia for an air base, so the British packed up the 2,000 residents,
people with British passports under British protection, and deported them to
Mauritius, one thousand miles away.
To cover up its crime against humanity, the British Foreign and Commonwealth
Office created the fiction that the inhabitants, whose families had been living
in the archipelago for two or three centuries, were "a floating population."
This fiction, wrote a legal adviser, bolsters "our arguments that the
territory has no indigenous or settled population."
Prime Minister Harold Wilson and Foreign Secretary Michael Stewart conspired
to mislead the UN about the deported islanders by, in Stewart's words, "
presenting any move as a change of employment for contract workers rather than
as a population resettlement."
Pilger interviewed some of the displaced persons, but emotional blocs will
shield patriotic Americans and British from the uncomfortable facts. Rational
skeptics can find a second documented account
of the Anglo-American rape of Diego Garcia online. An entire people were
Two thousand people were in the way of an American purpose an air base so
we had our British dependency deport them.
Several million Palestinians are in Israel's way. Pilger's documented account
of Israel's crushing of the Palestinians shows that our "democratic ally"
in the Middle East is capable of any evil and has no remorse or mercy. Israel
is an apt student of the British and American empires' attitudes toward lesser
beings. They simply don't count.
Those who are the salt of the earth take precedence over everything.