Highlights

 
Quotable
I abhor war and view it as the greatest scourge of mankind.
Thomas Jefferson
Original Letters Blog US Casualties Contact Donate

 
July 6, 2001

Quis Americanos Constituit Judices Nationum?


by Joseph Stromberg

QUIS CONSTITUIT IPSOS CUSTODES?

In 1160 A.D., John of Salisbury, angry at Frederick Barbarossa’s interference in the election of a Pope, famously asked "Quis Teutonicos constituit judices nationum?" – "Who made the Germans the judges of nations?" In our times, there must be many people, the world over, who ask themselves "Who made the Americans the judges of nations?" On this website, we have some idea of who did that. The short answer is northeastern elites assisted by scalawags and other allies, but the whole thing calls for some sorting out.

ANGLO-AMERICAN MILLENNIALISM ACROSS THE CENTURIES

The late Murray Rothbard was convinced that a particular religious outlook, post-millennial Pietist Protestantism, had served as a mighty ideological force for statism in America from the 19th century forward.1 According to this point of view, it was the duty and mission of the faithful to improve the world by removing "occasions for sin" (slavery, alcohol, polygamy, whatever), thereby ushering in a thousand-year period of peace and plenty preceding the return of Christ. This would be the Kingdom of God on Earth (KGE). Bringing this about, of course, might well require a lot of state intervention and organized violence (wars against the Bad) before the peace-and-plenty phase came into being. I think we can see where this is going.

REDEEMER NATION WHOSE WRIT RUNS EVERYWHERE

A classic study of American millennialism is Ernest Lee Tuveson’s Redeemer Nation: The Idea of America’s Millennial Role (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968). Tuveson traces the notion of a special American world mission to sectarian English Protestants, who were especially given to prophetic, apocalyptic and millennial ways of thinking, during and after the English Civil War and Puritan Revolution (1642-1660). Such thinkers repudiated the Catholic and Augustinian view that secular history was spiritually of secondary importance. They sough guidance in the Book of Daniel and in Revelations, two bodies of work that have always proved perilous to those who wished to find future events outlined in them.

The millennialist notion of the KGE came to American via New England ministers, who were its logical transmission belt. A whole series of New England divines – "Yankees" in the most historically specific sense of that term – handed down and refined that outlook through the 18th and 19th centuries. Toward the end of the 19th century, many of their successors retained the post-millennialist program of state intervention and endless reform but wished to play down or throw out the sentimental bits (God, Jesus, and so on). This last stage, which might be called the Protestant deformation, gave us such worthies as Woodrow Wilson, John Dewey, and many, many others. (See Rothbard.)

THE MISSION UNFOLDS

Already in the American Revolution there were those who saw in it the fulfillment of prophecy and the unleashing of a New Age (Novus Ordo Seclorum, anyone?). It seemed a perfect fit. As Tuveson notes, English millennialists had already fused Sir Francis Bacon’s notion of material-scientific progress through knowledge-as-power with their vision of the future. The spirit of the whole thing is captured somewhat in William Blake’s "Jerusalem," into the song version of which the Monty Python crew were always launching at appropriate times in their sketches.

In America, where a relatively free economy and immense unexploited natural resources held out prospects of boundless progress, such ideas became second nature. It remained only for Americans to suppose that the mission to regenerate the world had shifted westward to their side of the Atlantic Ocean. The words of Bishop George Berkeley could only have encouraged them:

"Westward the course of empire takes its way;
The four first acts already past,
A fifth shall close the drama with the day;
Time’s noblest offspring is the last..."
(Tuveson, p. 94)

By the mid-19th century, post-millennial Protestantism had made great strides in the North. You can trace its migration through the Yankee belt from Portland, Maine to Portland, Oregon. All Northern Protestantism was falling under its sway, with the exception of conservative Presbyterians and Lutherans. The South remained immune 'til long after the War of 1861-1865.

Combined with Manifest Destiny and the notion of Anglo-Saxon superiority of blood and institutions, the doctrine of an American mission of world salvation served well as an ideology of war and expansion. From this standpoint, the "Civil War" could be seen as a religious crusade to purify and redeem the Nation, rather than as a struggle over economic and political issues, which might have been resolved by other means.

FIFTH MONARCHY MEN ON THEIR SIXTH CRUSADE

I have given only the barest outline here. Tuveson’s book should be read in its entirety by anyone who wants to understand the long-standing American sense of boundless world mission. I should not be understood as saying that Yankee clergymen and their secularized doctrinal successors, all by themselves, brought into existence the present U.S. empire. The doctrine does suggest, however, why American wars take on the moral tone of the Crusades and why no weapon can be too destructive or cruel to use in these wars.

With the Soviet Union out of the picture as threat and embodiment of evil, we can expect to hear a lot more about the positive, philanthropic mission of the empire. We heard a lot about it under the administration of the Arkansas Caligula. The Yankee school marm’s lessons continue in more muted form under George W.

Notes

1. Murray N. Rothbard, "Origins of the Welfare State in America," Journal of Libertarian Studies, 12, 2 (Fffall 1996), esp. pp. 198-210.

comments on this article?
 
 
Most Recent Joseph Stromberg Column
Archives

  • An Anti-Imperialist's Reading List: Part Two
    2/7/2005

  • An Anti-Imperialist's Reading List: Part One
    1/24/2005

  • Murray N. Rothbard on States, War, and Peace: Part II
    1/17/2005

  • Murray N. Rothbard on States, War, and Peace: Part I
    1/10/2005

  • Inventing Iraq – Yet Again?
    5/12/2004

  • Kantians With Cruise Missiles: The Highest Stage of 'Liberal' Imperialism
    12/23/2003

  • The 'Necessary' Hegemon Revisited
    7/15/2003

  • A Homeland So Secure We Wouldn't Want To Live There
    6/7/2003

  • Asymmetric Politics
    5/10/2003

  • Truman, Treaties, and the Bricker Amendment
    4/19/2003

  • Don't Mention the W**
    3/30/2003

  • Awe Shocks
    3/8/2003

  • The Crazies Who Preceded the Loonies
    2/8/2003

  • On Some Rhetorical Devices of the War Party
    1/27/2003

  • War and Its Discontents
    1/11/2003

  • The Unresolved Problem of the United Nations
    12/28/2002

  • Masters of All They Survey
    12/7/2002

  • 'Crackpot Realism' Again?
    11/18/2002

  • The Once Controversial Question of War Finance
    11/2/2002

  • What Is 'New' In the New Bush Doctrine?
    10/12/2002

  • The Ghost of Henry Cabot Lodge
    9/14/2002

  • The Claims for Total War Revisited
    9/2/2002

  • Liberventionism III: The Flight from History
    8/10/2002

  • Liberventionism II: The Flight from Theory
    7/20/2002

  • Show Us the 'War Power'!
    7/6/2002

  • Cracks in the Façade of the Civic Religion
    6/15/2002

  • John Stuart Mill and Liberal Imperialism
    5/18/2002

  • Cold War Liberalism:
    4/27/2002

  • Liberventionism Rides Again
    4/13/2002

  • ONE LESSON IS BETTER THAN NONE
    3/23/2002

  • Third World Kaplan and the Empire of Gloom
    3/2/2002

  • The Debate We Never Have
    2/16/2002

  • Fast Times at National Review
    1/26/2002

  • Conserving Nothing
    1/5/2002

  • Who Let the Dogs Out?
    12/14/2001

  • Is There a Constitution?
    11/24/2001

  • Chimes of Wilson Flashing
    11/10/2001

  • Not Exactly World War II,
    10/19/2001

  • Big Government, Having Never Gone Away, Is Now Said To Be 'Back'
    9/28/2001

  • The Jingoes and the Social Reformers
    9/14/2001

  • Irrepressible Conflicts Everywhere
    8/24/2001

  • Eugen Richter on War and Empire
    8/3/2001

  • Hegel, Well-Regulated Police States, and Empire
    7/20/2001

  • Quis Americanos Constituit Judices Nationum?
    7/6/2001

  • The Peculiar U.S. Theory of Self-Defense
    6/12/2001

  • A Short History of Warmongering at the National Review
    5/15/2001

  • Howard Homan Buffett:
    4/24/2001

  • China Syndrome
    4/10/2001

  • Same Old Story: Film at Eleven
    3/27/2001

  • Empire and Reaction
    3/13/2001

  • Richard M. Weaver on Civilization, Ontology, and War
    2/27/2001

  • An Anti-Imperialist's Reading List:: Part Two
    2/20/2001

  • An Anti-Imperialist's Reading List: Part One
    1/30/2001

  • Janus-Faced Universalism and Rosy-Fingered Dawn
    1/16/2001

  • Western Civilization: Love It Or Leave It
    12/26/2000

  • Competing Producers of Security: Round One
    12/12/2000

  • Chalmers Johnson on an ‘Ersatz Roman Empire’
    11/21/2000

  • Random Thoughts on Nationalism
    11/7/2000

  • Was There ‘Revolution’ in the American Revolution?
    10/24/2000

  • Rebels Against State-Building: The General Crisis of the 17th Century
    10/10/2000

  • Is the Union Older Than the States?
    9/26/2000

  • Some Unsaxon Chronicles
    9/19/2000

  • War Is Dead, Hooray, Hooray
    9/12/2000

  • The Under-Appreciated Robert Nisbet
    9/5/2000

  • Bureaucracy, State, and Empire
    8/29/2000
  • More Archives
    Joseph R. Stromberg has been writing for libertarian publications since 1973, including The Individualist, Reason, the Journal of Libertarian Studies, Libertarian Review, and the Agorist Quarterly, and is completing a set of essays on America's wars. He was recently named the JoAnn B. Rothbard Historian in Residence at the Ludwig von Mises Institute. His column, "The Old Cause," appears alternating Fridays on Antiwar.com.

    Reproduction of material from any original Antiwar.com pages
    without written permission is strictly prohibited.
    Copyright 2003 Antiwar.com