O'Brien offered no evidence for his claims. It would be a little hard to do so, since the events he is talking about have yet to take place. His firm prediction is but preliminary to his real message, directed at the Serbs: vote the wrong way and you risk US military action. Milosevic "does not have a free hand" to rig the vote, O'Brien warned. The United States is willing "to stand up for the stability of the region." Since the US Government has already stated that a Milosevic victory is only possible in the event of vote rigging, his threat is as unambiguous as it is crude. A US-led bombing onslaught on Yugoslavia to ensure a "democratic transition" looks to be on the cards. Already the papers are filled with laughably absurd stories of British troops foiling alleged plots by Serb special forces to launch bomb attacks in Kosovo to during the elections.

It is extraordinary that Americans seem so untroubled by their Government adopting an imperial style of rule that would have been crude even by Soviet or Nazi standards. In the United States, it is illegal for political parties to receive money from foreign sources, let alone foreign governments. A US organization funded by a foreign government has to register as a foreign agent. Yet the Clinton Administration thinks it perfectly reasonable to corrupt the entire political system of another country by flooding it with vast sums of foreign money. The "civil society" we are allegedly fostering is total fraud, with no genuine roots among the people and entirely dependent on US Government largesse.

On July 29, 1999 during Hearings before the European Affairs Subcommittee of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Robert Gelbard, US Special Envoy to the Balkans, outlined the extraordinary scope of US interference in the life of Yugoslavia. There were, first, the opposition parties. They are "best served," he explained somewhat condescendingly, "if we provide them with technical assistance and first-class political advice, the kinds that may seem commonplace to us but represent a whole different way of thinking to them." Then there are the "youth and student organizations, as well as independent labor unions…undoubtedly…important sources of mobilization in the future." Gelbard then spoke of something US policymakers refer to as "independent media" – paid agents of the US Government touting the US Government line: "What we're trying to do…is support an alternative indigenous voice for the Serbian people through mechanisms such as ANEM, the Network of Independent Radio and Television." The use of the word "indigenous" is priceless. One wonders if he managed to keep a straight face as he said it.

Fashioning a Yugoslav "opposition" made to order for Washington has been a major preoccupation for some years. Paul B. McCarthy of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) testifying to the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe that "the West should help the democratic political opposition develop a concrete program which offers positive alternatives to the destructive policies of the Milosevic regime. Democratic think tanks, independent research organizations and expert groups should be supported to develop these alternative policy recommendations. Furthermore, dissemination of this new democratic thinking to the broad public must be encouraged by fostering close cooperation among the think tanks, opposition parties and the independent media." Note the way the NED does not for one moment doubt its right to reorganize Yugoslav civil and political life for the sake of US interests.

One of the organizations receiving money from the NED is the International Republican Institute (IRI). Starting in 1997, the IRI has been bankrolling political parties and student organizations in Yugoslavia. The IRI claims that it has "supported pro-reform political parties and student organizations through technical support programs that training and consultations to strengthen and enlarge the parties' grassroots organizations and help them devise communication and coalition building strategies that would solidify their combined support. Opinion polls taken during this period suggested that a substantial majority of the electorate did not support the coalition of Serbian governing parties controlled by Yugoslav President Slobodan Milosevic. Only 20 percent of Serbs supported the coalition's lead party, the Socialists." Note that the language the US Government to describe the "opposition" is almost always identical. Everyone is continually being enjoined to unite to oust Milosevic. Disagreements, however important – essential one would have thought to the very "pluralism" the United States likes to lecture others about – must be set aside for the sake of the of the common good, as determined by Washington. Moreover, the 20 percent figure is illuminating. The recent opinion polls being trumpeted to show how badly Milosevic is trailing all repeat the 20 percent figure. Not 15 percent, not 30 percent – always 20 percent. Apparently, no departures from the official script are to be permitted.

The IRI boasts also of having "worked with opposition leaders to devise ways of increasing their voter identification and ability to influence the national political agenda." In other words, US funds were going towards providing free propaganda for US-approved politicians. As for the much-vaunted Otpor, a favorite of the Western media circles, here is what the IRI says: "In the fall of 1999, the student resistance movement OTPOR began to organize protests against crackdowns on media and academic freedoms. OTPOR is currently preparing plans, with IRI's technical support, for a Get-Out-The-Vote campaign for elections in 2000."

Not surprisingly perhaps, Otpor sounds very much like an organization run from Washington. Yugoslavia must undertake "full cooperation with The Hague Tribunal For War Crimes." There is to be "full protection of private ownership rights, proceeded by compulsory and fair privatization, the establishment of a free market economy, and the opening of the economy to international financial organizations and international investment." This stuff is straight out of the IMF playbook. Needless to say, Otpor also urges the formation of "a unified block of all relevant democratic forces in Serbia with the principal objective of replacing Milosevic and his government" – all entirely in accordance with the official US Government line.

The NED funds the G-17 group of "independent economists" which, we are happily informed, is "conducting a research program to identify barriers to private sector development at the local and federal levels." The G-17 ideas about the future of Yugoslavia are apparent in the "Proposal to the Stability Pact for South East Europe to Organize a Regional Funding Conference for the Reconstruction of Post-Milosevic Serbia," put forward by Serbia's Democratic Opposition with, we are told, "assistance from G17 PLUS." The program pledges that "privatization is …our great concern and a commitment to swift and efficient privatization is crucial for economic reconstruction." However, it goes on, the "first political priority for the new reformist government will be to address the issue of the fiscal deficit. That will require the change of both the current tax and public expenditure policies. Fiscal reform is a prerequisite for monetary stability and the renewal of Serbian international credibility. Radical fiscal reform will demand hard political decisions for the reduction of expenditures, changing the priority in public spending and measures to increase the effectiveness of tax collection…. We, the democratic opposition of Serbia, are willing to explain the significance of these reforms to our political public. We are also ready to undertake this political risk as we deeply believe that fiscal changes within a general reform of the state and its apparatus are critical to the country's future and its speedy development." Note that a statement such as this does not even pretend to address the people of Yugoslavia. It offers nothing to ordinary voters. Why on earth would anyone vote for a political group that promises to cut public expenditure, close down so-called "inefficient" industries, and open up the country to predatory foreign investors hunting for bargains? The pledge of the so-called "Democratic Opposition" is directed entirely towards the Governments of the United States, the European Union, foreign investors and bankers, the IMF and the World Bank – evidently the only constituency worth considering. Hilariously, the NED also boasts of funding trade unions in Yugoslavia such as UGS Nezavisnost described as "a multiethnic trade union confederation which opposes the Milosevic regime." One wonders if this "trade union" is also obligated to support the goals of "market democracy," "privatization" and "debt reduction." The mind boggles at how much grassroots support it must enjoy.