The Non-Issue: Agonizing, Incremental Israeli Expansion & Occupation

At Mondoweiss, Allison Deger informs us of pending Israeli legislation that would allow Israeli settlers in the West Bank to construct unpaved roads without a permit. Essentially, “settlers would be given a quick and cheap holding tactic, to confiscate Palestinian land.”

Under the proposed legislation, Israeli-only roads in the West Bank will begin to take on a different function. This network of roadways currently exists to speed travel between the settlements and create physical barriers between Palestinian villages. The new law would treat roads as something similar to the caravans in illegal settler outposts – a means of pushing Palestinians off their land. The Civil Administration confirms the land grabbing function of the bill, stating: “the request did not deal with the paving of roads for vehicular traffic to preserve this land.”

Chiam Levinson explains in Haaretz, “as a practical matter it would significantly expand the amount of land around West Bank settlements that is off-limits to Palestinians.”

There has been considerable focus in recent weeks on the inordinate sway Israel has on U.S. foreign policy, especially towards Iran. Reckless Israeli policy and rhetoric on the Iran issue could get the U.S. into a war that Obama administration officials have repeatedly criticized as unnecessary. But almost no attention has been paid lately to how U.S. subservience to Israel works to continue the defunct peace process and how lavish U.S. support for Israel is actually support for illegal Israeli expansion and annexation of Palestinian land.

This piece of legislation is a perfect example of that. Israeli-only roads in the occupied West Bank have for a long time illustrated rather starkly the nature of the apartheid system there. But this legislation would build on that and expand the amount of land Palestinians are not allowed to trespass. It is a policy of expansion, clear as day.

There is another plan being pushed in the Israeli Knesset which proposed to annex “Area C” of the West Bank, which makes up over 60% of the total, and establish formal Israeli law there and “naturalize” some 50,000 Palestinians from the seized territory. At least 27 Likud party Knesset members have endorsed the idea.

Last week, Israel again approved the construction of 695 new housing units in and around the West Bank settlement of Shiloh, north-east of Ramallah. The United Nations special coordinator for the Middle East peace process, Robert Serry, called the decision “deplorable and moves us further away from the goal of a two-state solution.” Settlements on Palestinian territory and the related destruction of Palestinian homes has been constantly recognized as illegal by the international community. The United Nations recently called on Israel to immediately halt the destruction of Palestinian homes in the West Bank, as it also violates international law. Israeli forces destroyed 622 Palestinian homes in the West Bank in 2011, forcibly displacing over 1,100 people, over half of them children. “The current policy and practice of demolitions cause extensive human suffering and should end,” said UN humanitarian coordinator for the occupied Palestinian territories, Maxwell Gaylard.

When asked about this, Israeli officials like Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu sort of shrug and act as if this is just some naturally occurring phenomenon instead of a systematic policy. In a press conference with Obama in the summer of 2010, Netanyahu said two states based on the ’67 borders was impossible because of “certain demographic changes,” forgetting to mention that those changes were intended to prevent such a political settlement. Again, the policy is clearly expansion, if incremental. And it goes on because of U.S. support.

A recent report from the European Union warned that “if current trends are not stopped and reversed, the establishment of a viable Palestinian state within pre-1967 borders seem more remote than ever.” And that, indeed, seems to be the intention.

The EU report explained how “a combination of house and farm building demolitions; a prohibitive planning regime; relentless settlement expansion; the military’s separation barrier; obstacles to free movement; and denial of access to vital natural resources, including land and water, is eroding Palestinian tenure of the large tract of the West Bank on which hopes of a contiguous Palestinian state depend.”

Everyone is in on the debate about what to do vis-a-vis Israel and Iran. Even the elite media puts their two-cents of propaganda in there. But there is no prominent debate on Israeli occupation and American support of it, anywhere.

(Image via Mondoweiss)

8 thoughts on “The Non-Issue: Agonizing, Incremental Israeli Expansion & Occupation”

  1. I like how conquering and subjugating native inhabitants and their properties is "annexation" and "naturalization." States are really big mafias.

  2. When Palestinian TV is on, it shows Sesame Street.
    When it shows Sesame Street, it shows Bert.
    When it shows Bert, it shows it might be OK to be gay.
    When it shows it might be OK to be gay, the TV censors come out. 
    When the TV censors come out, they get friendly with the Palestinians.
    Don’t let your TV censors get friendly with the Palestinians.
    Confiscate Palestinian TV.

  4. Why (more) people in the west are NOT outraged by this is almost as infuriating as the situation itself.

  5. Pingback: Obama, Netanyahu Focus on Iran, Ignore Peace Process -- News from Antiwar.com

  9. Please point to the specific clause(s) of Article II of the Constitution, or any one of the Constitution's amendments, which clearly ENUMBRATE(S) the power of the president to summarily annul any of the rights contained therein, or order any other branch of the federal government to do the same, thereby effectively nullifying his own office, along with the authoritay of any other branch of the federal government.

  13. So I propose a correction to Mr. Glaser's last sentence: "Namely, these provisions are now on the books, and I assume future leaders could still draw on the language in NDAA to deprive *people* of the right to defend themselves in a court."

  15. And that is most definitely an Obama administration policy. Now the enablers of torturer are testifying on why we should all have no rights, when they should be the ones being sentenced.

  16. Where U.S. Government appears headed with the Patriot Act, The National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 and recently introduced “Enemy Expatriation Act” that would allow U.S. Government to Strip Americans of Citizenship without evidence or a conviction—is getting

  17. Power to arbitrarily arrest, charge, Indefinitely Detain Americans that participate in 1st Amendment activities (on the premise) certain 1st Amendment Activities appeared intended or were used to support or provoke hostilities, combatants, belligerents; terrorism and or threaten

  18. National Security. It is foreseeable millions of Americans would increasingly not attend political meetings, peaceful protests or make comments on the Internet out of fear they might be arrested, lose their job; be put on Homeland Security’s NO Hire List, especially if they work for a government agency or contractor—that happened in Nazi Germany.

  19. Soon Americans won’t be able to arrange or attend a 1st Amendment protected meeting or other activity e.g., a doctor or business appointment without government/police knowing about it. U.S. Government is on the threshold of having surveillance cameras and drones most everywhere.

  20. TSA is expanding its checkpoints on highways, bus and train stops and ports. U.S. Government is actively monitoring without warrants—journalists, U.S. Citizens’ social networks, emails, phone calls, Internet Activity and faxes. One can only guess how much radiation is transmitted into the bodies of Americans by U.S.

  21. Really good read for me, This is exactly what I was looking for. Thanks for sharing this great article! That is very interesting Smile I love reading and I am always searching for informative information like this!
    Jasa seo

  22. I really love this beautiful and artistic work. Thanks a lot for posting this precious blog post.I guess looking back at it, that may be true (or at least truthy) but writing about what we have now as if it was the only thing we could have had but it just took a while is what triggered my comment.

  24. I really really like this wonderful and creative perform. Thanks a lot for publishing this valuable short article.I think looking returning at it, that may be real (or at least truthy) but composing about what we have now as if it was the only factor we could have had but it just took a while is what activated my opinion. pavement markings pompano beach

Comments are closed.

viewpoint highlights
breaking news
© 2024 Antiwar.com. All rights reserved.
Antiwar.com Blog Stock Photos provided by our partner Depositphotos