Congress Blocks Successive Efforts to Reduce Government Secrecy

Steven Aftergood on the stubborn secrecy of Congress:

It is a simple fact that under the FISA Amendments Act “the government can and does intercept the communications of U.S. citizens, even in the absence of any particularized warrant or showing of probable cause,” stated the dissenting members of the Committee in the new report.

“The public has a right to know, at least in general terms, how often [this authority] is invoked, what kind of information the government collects using this authority, and how the government limits the impact of these programs on American citizens,” the minority members wrote.  But an amendment to require unclassified public reporting on these topics, offered by Rep. Bobby Scott (D-VA), was defeated 10-19.

Another amendment introduced by Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) would have required publication of unclassified summaries of decisions of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that have interpreted the law in significant ways.  “This amendment aimed only to make the legal reasoning of the FISA Court available to the public.  It also sought to ensure that the United States should not have a secret body of law.”  It was rejected by a vote of 13-17.

A third amendment would have required the Inspectors General of the intelligence community and the Justice Department to produce a public estimate of how many Americans have already had their communications collected under this law.  The amendment, by Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-TX), failed by a vote of 11-20.

See also the recent waffling on harsh anti-leak, pro-secrecy legislation from the Senate Intelligence Committee.

6 thoughts on “Congress Blocks Successive Efforts to Reduce Government Secrecy”

  2. Ok 3 good ammendments introduced by 3 Democrats all defeated. What were the partisan breakdown of the defeats?

    My suspicion is they broke mostly along party lines with Republicans voting to defeat them. I base this not on some simplistic "four legs good, two bad" analysis of "Democrats good, Republicans bad", because if that was true Obama wouldn't be the disaster he is, but of rather how the House has been *consistently* voting on civil liberties issues. In the Congress it is the Republicans that are consistently voting against our civil liberties in general (Ron Paul exempted of course). If so all pretenses of the Republican party of standing for freedom are a scam. I think many people already know that. But how Republicans go on about how pure they are and how much they care about our rights when absolutely nothing is at stake. Maybe we do need to just vote more good civil liberties loving Democrats to Congress. Maybe that is the best thing we can do. We can't necessarily do much about the Senate or the Presidency as those two are completely bought and sold to the highest bidder, corrupt to the core.

    1. One doesn't have to look any further than who the neocons are in congress who would vote against spying on Americans…

  3. Surveillance Court that have interpreted the law in significant ways. “This amendment aimed only to make the legal reasoning of the FISA Court available to the public. It also sought to ensure that the United States should not have a secret body of law.” It was rejected by a vote of 13-17.

  4. But an amendment to require unclassified public reporting on these topics, offered by Rep. Bobby Scott (D-VA), was defeated 10-19.

  5. Music education is the motivation which we can get from our ancestors, our environment, or may be social atmosphere. People get music education to continue their traditional values the way they are.

  10. The conclusion is then followed by the suggestions and recommendations of the research. In this section, the researcher gives suggestion and recommendations for the future researchers of this domain.

Comments are closed.

viewpoint highlights
breaking news
© 2024 Antiwar.com. All rights reserved.
Antiwar.com Blog Stock Photos provided by our partner Depositphotos