What Obama Aides Say About Syria

Writing in The New Yorker, Dexter Filkins runs through the Obama administration’s reluctance to further intervene in Syria. There are many cons White House officials articulate, but here’s two that stood out to me.

Unintended Consequences

Filkins quotes a senior White House official as being mindful of the blowback experienced when the US armed and trained jihadists in Afghanistan in the 1980s, and all of the consequences of that, including the longest war in America’s history:

Still, Obama has said that he is worried that arming the rebels will have unintended consequences: a genocide against the Alawites; weapons falling into the hands of Islamist extremists, as happened when the U.S. armed Afghan jihadis in the nineteen-eighties; or a rapid political collapse that demolishes the state’s institutions. “If we’re not careful about who gets weapons, we’ll be cleaning that up for years,’’ the senior White House official told me. “We saw that movie in Afghanistan.”

Ineffective Options

As I’ve argued here many times – indeed, as top military officials at the Defense Department have argued – taking military action is likely to worsen the humanitarian situation.

Another concern is that, as in Libya, grounding enemy planes and helicopters will not end the majority of civilian deaths; artillery and Scud missiles appear to be killing far more people than planes are. “In Syria, the regime-controlled areas are interspersed with the rebel-controlled areas, so a no-fly zone is not going to stop the killing,’’ [Benjamin] Rhodes [Obama’s deputy national-security adviser] said. “Once the violence became sectarian, you can’t cover every neighborhood from the air.” In this view, a no-fly zone would be only the beginning of U.S. involvement. “What happens when the rebels keep losing?’’ a senior defense official told me. “What happens when civilians keep getting killed? They will ask us to do more. And we’ll already be in. We will be invested in an outcome. Pretty soon, we’ll be striking ground targets.”

…“We do not want to see the Syrian government disappear,’’ [Robert] Ford [U.S. Ambassador to Syria] said. It “will create more refugee flows; it will help the extremists…That is our biggest concern in terms of maintaining unity and keeping Syria from being an operating base for terrorist extremists.”

Obama wants to see Assad go, but he is terrified that, if it happens too fast, a vacuum could open up—like the one in Baghdad in 2003—and be filled by Islamist extremists.

Still, Obama’s limited interventionism in Syria continues to worsen the situation in a direction contrary to the above stated concerns. Filkins:

A large proportion of the rebels’ matériel is provided by Qatar, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia: rockets, guns, and millions of rounds of ammunition, often bought in Croatia and shipped to rebel bases on the Turkish and Jordanian borders. At a congressional hearing in April, Secretary of State John Kerry said that the United States was not arming the rebels but was “coördinating very, very closely with those who are.” Officials in Washington told me that they believe the weapons have begun to tilt the balance in favor of the rebels.

59 thoughts on “What Obama Aides Say About Syria”

  1. Who cares what these Obama flunkies say? Obama himself knows exactly what he's doing: preparing for the Iran war by destabilizing Syria for the benefit of Israel.

    As for the issue of "arming Islamists", everyone in the intelligence community has already weighed in on that: the US is ALREADY DOING IT by allowing Saudi Arabia and Qatar to do it. They've been doing it since the beginning. So how stupid would Obama be to think that isn't already the case?

    As for "unintended consequences", that's a joke. The INTENDED consequences are well known: a Syria and Hizballah in Lebanon that are ineffective actors in an Iran war. Israel couldn't care less about a bunch of Islamists trying to run Syria and a fractured Syria has been in the Israeli game plan for decades. The US can use Israel to keep Syria in check.

    All these statements are either from people out of the loop on the real purpose of the Syrian crisis – or more likely are simply lies to make it look like Obama doesn't want a Syrian war.

  2. Pingback: Brzezinski: Syria Intervention Will Only Make it Worse « Antiwar.com Blog
  3. Pingback: Robert Gates: Intervention in Syria Would Be ‘A Mistake’ « Antiwar.com Blog
  4. Pingback: Don’t Believe the Scary Headlines of Impending US War in Syria « Antiwar.com Blog

  5. People need to understand that everything we see on TV, on the web or in the papers is highly manipulated and affected by whoever is in charge, and/or whoever has more money…

  6. you are really committed to changing your lifestyle and getting in shape. If you are prepared to make some simple changes you'll see (and feel) the results in just a few weeks. Before you embark on any serious diet and exercise program however, it's always a good idea to check with your physician first.I getting inshape

  7. Great weblog here! Also your site quite a bit up fast! What web host are you the usage of? Can I get your associate link on your host? I want my site loaded up as quickly as yours lolforex news

  9. What is most odd is that the right-wingers on the attack against the small libertarian-leaning wing of the party that opposes rabid interventionism seem thoroughly unaware that what they call “naive” foreign policy is actually backed up by history and much of academia.

  10. It may well be, rather, that when, say, a company or organization is asked by the media to provide a spokesperson to comment on some damn thing, it provides a man rather than a woman

  13. The malestream media couldn't even grant women tokenistic majority status in fashion reporting. If HBO were to do a sitcom about the voices of this generation that reflected just who had the power to speak

  14. This is just what I'm looking for, I was actually going through the nice helpful tips from the blog and I put respect to the writer of this post, enjoying the smart way you write articles in this

  15. This is best site to spent time on .I just stumbled upon your chatty blog and desired to say that I have really enjoyed reading your very well written blog posts. I will be your frequent visitor, that's for sure.

  16. Needed to compose you a word regarding the nice opinions you have contributed. Your good knowledge in playing with all the pieces is very useful. To be honest, this has been one outstanding blog

  17. That's pretty powerful stuff. I like the way your logic follows, and how you're able to put it into words with such a powerful post! I am enthralled.

  18. The urgency to drive digital revenues increased this year as media companies sought new ways to offset declining print revenues or to build sustainable digital-only publishing brands.Thanks

  19. War is never be any solution for our problems. We should always prefer peaceful world and spread awareness for peaceful life. Get best online help from expert professional writers. That can be a better solution for your help.

  20. “If we’re not careful about who gets weapons, we’ll be cleaning that up for years,’’ the senior White House official told me. “We saw that movie in Afghanistan.”Arlene Barnett

  21. “If we’re not careful about who gets weapons, we’ll be cleaning that up for years,’’ the senior White House official told me. “We saw that movie in Afghanistan.”social media news release

  22. “If we’re not careful about who gets weapons, we’ll be cleaning that up for years,’’ the senior White House official told me. “We saw that movie in Afghanistan.”Marnie Bennett

  23. “If we’re not careful about who gets weapons, we’ll be cleaning that up for years,’’ the senior White House official told me. “We saw that movie in Afghanistan.”Marc Sparks is the owner

  24. coördinating very, very closely with those who are.” Officials in Washington told me that they believe the weapons have begun to tilt the balance in favor of the rebels.more commonly known as

  25. Great weblog here! Also your site quite a bit up fast! What web host are you the usage of? Can I get your associate link on your host? I want my site loaded up as quickly as yours lolkingsford serangoon condo

  34. Great weblog here! Also your site quite a bit up fast! What web host are you the usage of? Can I get your associate link on your host? I want my site loaded up as quickly as yours lol

  36. It may well be, rather, that when, say, a company or organization is asked by the media to provide a spokesperson to comment on some damn thing, it provides a man rather than a woman

  37. It may well be, rather, that when, say, a company or organization is asked by the media to provide a spokesperson to comment on some damn thing, it provides a man rather than a woman drums

  45. You share tons of interesting info, neat and excellent design you've got here. It's certainly one of the most informative stuff on this topic I've ever read. manual blog commenting

  46. You are every reason, every hope, and every dream I've ever had, and no matter what happens to us in the future, everyday we are together is the greatest day of my life. I will always be yours. injustice game cheats

  48. I was surfing net and fortunately came across this site and found very interesting stuff here. Its really fun to read. I enjoyed a lot. Thanks for sharing this wonderful information. princess cut moissanite

  49. This is very interesting content! I have thoroughly enjoyed reading your points and have come to the conclusion that you are right about many of them. You are great.life insurance annuity

Comments are closed.

viewpoint highlights
breaking news
© 2024 Antiwar.com. All rights reserved.
Antiwar.com Blog Stock Photos provided by our partner Depositphotos