Why the GOP will lose ’16 (hint: it’s spelled S-H-E-L-D-O-N)

Gross.

That’s really the only word that comes to mind after reading Dana Milbank’s account today of the recent GOP pilgrimage to Sin City to kiss the ring of Sheldon Adelson, the 9th richest man in the world, and quite possibly the most  ideologically driven of them all. That’s not to say he can pick winners. Remember, Sheldon bombed as kingmaker in the 2014 elections (in fact, most people believe he actually blew the Republicans’ chances in the race entirely). He chose to plow $16 million of his personal coin into Republican has-been Newt Gingrich, who, let’s be serious, only runs for president these days to bolster his own marketing and fundraising schemes. The only effect was to injure Mitt Romney  in the primary. Romney never  fully recovered, and lost terribly to President Obama in November, despite of an infusion of Adelson cash later on. As they say, ‘heck of a job.

Sheldon Adelson, GOP kingmaker?
Sheldon Adelson, GOP kingmaker?

But that hasn’t stopped the first crop of 2016 nominee wannabes from jumping to Adelson’s whistle:  Republican Party players John Kasich, Jeb Bush, Chris Christie and Scott Walker spent the weekend kowtowing like sops in a display Hollywood couldn’t have sketched out better. Mindful of their party’s family values, no doubt, they guilelessly delivered themselves up to the mogul of the Las Vegas Sands Corporation empire, square in the epicenter of blackjack and booze, prostitutes and pleasure. Milbank :

Adelson was hosting the Republican Jewish Coalition at his Venetian hotel and gambling complex, and the would-be candidates paraded themselves before the group, hoping to catch the 80-year-old casino mogul’s eye. Everybody knows that, behind closed doors, politicians often sell themselves to the highest bidder; this time, they were doing it in public, as if vending their wares at a live auction.

Adelson has bestowed great generosity on Republicans — $150 million in post-Citizens United cash to their candidates and causes during the last presidential election cycle — but clearly only those that adhere to his own fervently hawkish views on the Middle East. Adelson is unabashed defender of Israel who, according to The New York Times, “opposes any territorial compromise to make way for a Palestinian state.” He is openly Islamophobic, saying at one point that “not all Islamists are terrorists, but all the terrorists are Islamists,”  and defending Gingrich with vigor when the former Speaker of the House famously declared Palestinians “an invented people.”

Adelson has been known to underwrite congressional boondoggles to Israel, helping to shape their views on foreign policy. His attempt at influencing outcomes doesn’t end at the border. In 2007, according to The New York Times, Adelson started a free daily newspaper widely viewed as supportive of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, “a close friend who shares his hawkish outlook.” The NYT also noted that at one point, Adelson was rumored to be calling for the ouster of Condoleezza Rice from the Bush Administration because she  — and former Prime Minister Ehud Olmert — were “betraying Israel.”

Anything close to an Adelson foreign policy in the White House would be a nightmare, and most likely everyone knows it but that hasn’t kept power-desperate Republicans from taking his money. Aside from the millions he wasted on Gingrich, he’s sprinkled millions on other hawks, like John McCain, Rudy Giuliani, George W. Bush, and Eric Cantor, too.

And he’s known as a street fighter — aside from making his fortune in one of the most predatory and exploitive industries there is, in 2013 Adelson admitted he “might” have violated federal bribery laws during an ongoing investigation of his dealings with the Chinese. Adelson owns five of Macau’s 35 casinos (including the biggest, the Venetian Macau) and reportedly wants a much bigger imprint on the Chinese mainland. Investigators want to know more amid a number lawsuits alleging that Adelson bribed officials to exploit Macau, and to pursue his commercial interests in Beijing. According to Wikipedia, Adelson’s Las Vegas Sands brought in $4.2 billion in Macau-generated revenue in 2011 alone.

Many have sued Adelson, but not all win. According to The New York Times, his own sons sued him, alleged he cheated them, but they lost. Meanwhile Adelson is always suing others, and sometimes he wins.  He filed a libel suit against a Las Vegas newspaper columnist, John L. Smith, who eventually had to declare bankruptcy. He won a libel suit against the Daily Mail of London in 2008. The newspaper had accused him of pursuing “despicable business practices” and having “habitually and corruptly bought political favour.” Adelson said it was “a grave slur” on his “personal integrity and business reputation”, and he won a judgment of approximately £4 million as a result.

He filed a similar suit against a Wall Street Journal writer in 2012 who called him “a scrappy, foul-mouthed billionaire from working-class Dorchester, Mass.”

Adelson may have a team of lawyers to defend his name in the courtroom, and he may be able to call in the chits when he wants to massage or push legislation his way on the Hill, but delivering the next president is a fantasy he will likely never see realized. His zealousness appears to cloud his vision when it comes to picking favorites, and his favorites risk looking tawdry and bought when they take his money. And my, they look really foolish when they beg for it. According to Milbank:

Walker, the Wisconsin governor, pandered unabashedly by giving the Hebrew meaning of his son Matthew’s name and by mentioning that he displays a menorah at home along with the Christmas tree. And Christie, the New Jersey governor, gushed about his trip to Israel and the “occupied territories.”

That was a gaffe. Pro-Israel hawks consider the term pejorative and, at any rate, the more relevant occupied territory at the moment is the Republican Party — wholly occupied by billionaires.

But will they occupy the White House? If this kind of behavior is any indication, the answer is no.

 

 

56 thoughts on “Why the GOP will lose ’16 (hint: it’s spelled S-H-E-L-D-O-N)”

  2. I thought the Republicans were going to lose in 2016 because libertarians have and will continue to expose the fraud and statism that is conservatism. But hey neocon chickenhawk billionaires work too

  3. I despise casinos precisely because of the sleazy people who own them. I would never enter a casino owned by this clown if my life depended on it. (Same for anything owned by Trump). It's sickening to see politicians genuflecting in front of him.

  4. We should always be careful of anyone who has dual national loyalty, since loyalty to any country other than our own usually means that the interests of our own country come second, if at all.

    1. Ah come on, doncha know this is the United States of Zion….nothing to see hear folks, move along now.

  5. Adelson is an old man and hopefully he will be pushing daisy's, by 2016. I better not say anything else about the guy. He does love to sue. If we have another Bush Clinton debacle in 2 years, this country is done. 310 million people in this country and that's all the choice we have.

    1. Piss on Adelson, that warmongering Zionist cretin. And piss on the hacks–The Overfed One, Bush, Kasich, and Walker–who grovel to that degenerate.

    1. She's almost a lock. Unless she declines for health reasons. Where's the anti-war faction within that party? It used to be there.

      1. The anti-war Dinocrats who wanted to remain Dinocrats shut up because the current President belongs to the Dinocratic Party. The ones who have integrity walked away from the D-Party.

        Also, the Malefactors Of Great Wealth were shrewd to choose a nominally black man as their puppet this time. The spineless sort of kinda-sorta-maybe liberals won't criticize any policy of Obummer's for fear of having the scarlet "R" forcibly sewn on their collars.

        2. Yup. Which means most of those self righteous hypocrites were never anti-war to begin with. They were just anti-Republican. Typical.

      1. I would have voted for her in 2008, but now that she's proven herself a willing puppet of the War Party, HELL NO.

        I guess I'll vote 3rd party again in 2016, just like in 2008 and 2012.

  7. Prepare for the Billionaire Battle Royal. On the right: Sheldon Adelson and the Koches. On the left: George Soros, Bill Gates, Larry Ellison, Mark Zuckerberg, Warren Buffett and Jim Chanos. FYI, Kelley, both parties are now wholly owned by the .01%.

    Y'all should have been around back in the '60s and '70s, when all Democrat candidates had to grovel before Chicago satrap Richard Daley and whichever satrap was running the AFL-CIO at the time. With few exceptions, all that ring-kissing did not help them either. Too bad the GOP refuses to learn from history, and is therefore condemned to repeat it.

  9. When did Las Vegas and casinos shed their connections as thinly veiled fronts for the Mafia? Meyer Lansky, call your office…

  10. Kelley Vlahos must be a democrat. Otherwise this post makes no sense what-so-ever. Why on earth does she or anyone else at Antiwar.com care if the destructocrat or rethuglican loses in 2016? The winner will inflict continued death, destruction, poverty, misery, and despair on the amerikan people dumb enough to vote for them and the rest of the world by extension. Who cares if Sheldon Adelson destroys the rethuglican party or not? I would say good riddance to the TOG (Thug Old Party) once and for all…….Kelley, if you want to do something useful, work for the destruction of both the destructocrats and rethuglicans……………………..

  11. Funny how Republicans squawk that the are not the party of the rich but of the people. Well Adelson has proven that to be false. This man has worked hard to try and buy GOP leaders for his own personal gain. He should be boycotted over everything he owns. Adelson is traitor to the American People.

  12. It should come as no surprise that Johnson is an outspoken advocate for the criminal prosecution of whistleblowers like Chelsea Manning or Edward Snowden. He served as general counsel during the height of the WikiLeaks scandal

  13. I found this informative and interesting blog so I think so it’s very useful and knowledge able.I would like to thank you for the efforts you have made in writing this blog. Keep posting like this I really enjoyed it and the rest of your site Great find. venus factor nz

  22. I’m excited to uncover this page. I need to to thank you for ones time for this particularly fantastic read. I definitely really liked every part of it and i also have you saved to fab to look at new information in your site. pure garcinia cambogia

  23. I just got to this amazing site not long ago. I was actually captured with the piece of resources you have got here. Big thumbs up for making such wonderful blog page…Medical School

  25. I’m honored to obtain a call from a friend as he identified the important tips shared on your site. Browsing your blog post is a real excellent experience… bed bugs bites

  28. If your idea of a good night out is spending time in a couple of great casinos, one of these cities could be your dream destination. Read on for some of the greatest gambling cities in the world.

  30. I just got to this amazing site not long ago. I was actually captured with the piece of resources you have got here. lab

  32. We should always be careful of anyone who has dual national loyalty, since loyalty to any country other than our own usually means that the interests of our own country come second, if at all. complications from xarelto

  33. We should always be careful of anyone who has dual national loyalty, since loyalty to any country other than our own usually means that the interests of our own country come second, if at all. complications from xarelto

  34. We should always be careful of anyone who has dual national loyalty, since loyalty to any country other than our own usually means that the interests of our own country come second, if at all. complications from xarelto

  35. We should always be careful of anyone who has dual national loyalty, since loyalty to any country other than our own usually means that the interests of our own country come second, if at all. complications from xarelto

  46. Excellent posting. Undoubtedly you are an expert when it comes to this writing. This is absolutely the first time I visited your site and to tell the truth it succeeds buy mixcloud plays

Comments are closed.

viewpoint highlights
breaking news
© 2024 Antiwar.com. All rights reserved.
Antiwar.com Blog Stock Photos provided by our partner Depositphotos