At the March 9 Democratic debate, Hillary Clinton had this to say about competitor Bernie Sanders’s favorable comments on Castro’s Cuba and the Sandinista regime in the ’80s: “if the values are that you oppress people, you disappear people, imprison people or even kill people for expressing their opinions…, that is not the kind of revolution of values that I ever want to see anywhere.” This, coming from a former Secretary of State who backed a right-wing coup in Honduras and proudly name-drops Henry Kissinger – Henry Kissinger! – as a close friend and mentor, is the kind of thing the Onion can’t compete with.
If Kissinger was known for anything in his years as National Security Adviser and Secretary of State, it was installing dictators who oppressed, disappeared and imprisoned people. He oversaw a wave of coups that swept South America in the late ’60s and ’70s, installing right-wing military regimes that tortured, murdered or disappeared dissidents by the thousands, and where a common fate for labor and peasant activists was to be found in a ditch with their faces hacked off. Under Kissinger the U.S. actively supported Operation Condor – the program by which these South American dictators used torture and murder to suppress opposition – with military aid and technical assistance. He gave the green light to Indonesia’s genocidal invasion of East Timor.
Clinton has a long history of close personal friendship with this monster, and indeed touts herself as something of a protégé. According to both Hillary and Bill, Kissinger praised her for running the State Department better than anybody in decades. And well might he praise her, because she’s followed in his footsteps in many ways. As Secretary of State, she oversaw the sale of millions of dollars worth of arms to despotic regimes that oppressed, disappeared and imprisoned people for expressing their opinions – many of which regimes were also large donors to the Clinton Foundation. And while we’re on the subject of people being murdered and disappeared, how about Berta Caceres – an activist murdered by the right-wing Honduran regime whose seizure of power Clinton backed in 2009?
As senator, Clinton voted to authorize George Bush’s criminal war of aggression on Iraq, which has resulted in hundreds of thousands of Iraqi deaths since 2003. She says now it was “a mistake.” It was a mistake all right. She mistakenly believed the vote would make her more viable as a future presidential candidate. She mistakenly predicted the way the political winds would be blowing when she decided to run for president.
And don’t forget Clinton’s support for the Obama administration’s indiscriminate use of drones for extrajudicial killing. Many of the victims were civilians, and hundreds of them were actually children.
If you add it all up, Hillary Clinton still isn’t quite the war criminal her old friend and mentor Henry Kissinger is. Those are some big, bloody shoes to fill. But if she’s elected she’ll grow into them.
Kevin Carson is a senior fellow of the Center for a Stateless Society and holds the Center’s Karl Hess Chair in Social Theory. Reprinted from Center for a Stateless Society with permission.
And lets not forget Miss Monster’s chummy relationship with former Secretary Madeleine “I think It was worth it” Albright.
Madeleine Albright is Chairman of the Board of Directors of the National Democratic Institute, a purported NGO that’s actually funded/supported by The National Endowment for Democracy (another purported NGO directly funded by the US government), USAID, the Department of State and about 20 other governments that are allies of the US.
NDI takes an active role in encouraging “democracy” in countries who are not allied with the US. From the point of view of governance of such countries, it is basically the agent of a foreign power (the US/West).
And her support for her husband’s sanctions, which banned water and sewage treatment equipment, vaccines, antibiotics and cancer chemotherapy drugs and resulted in well over a million deaths, half of them children under five. Add that to the 1 million plus from the 2nd Iraq war and 370,000 and counting in Syria, she is already well past Pol Pot, and we haven’t even counted Libya, Yemen or Afghanistan.
I much rather see a woman as president of the us than a clown like trump as the
President of the mightigest nation on earth!.
If you were any shallower you’d evaporate.
I guess she fits a loose definition of a woman
Then vote for Jill Stein. She’s a woman and she doesn’t reek to high heaven of children’s corpses.
Stein’s a little too much of a hawk for me. She only wants to cut US military spending by 50%.
Ha! Yeah but it’s a start. Maybe the Libertarians will float someone fiercer.
I’m left but open minded.
The Libertarian candidate pledge is to cut defense spending by 60% (10% more than Stein’s platform calls for).
My own congressional campaign platform calls for a cut of 75% over 10 years.
I’d vote for that! Where are you running?
And these are just her intended consequences. See Libya for the unintended ones.
H.C. is just one war hawk; Rubio is disappointing with his eagerness to entering wars without debates.
I remember reading of Nixon wanting to reduce the number of US troops in Viet Nam but Kissinger cautioned against it. Kissinger told Nixon….”It would be like feeding the American public peanuts. You give them a few and they will want more.”
How’s that for reducing the value of American lives to that of a peanut? He is an evil vile man who rivals GW Bush for ineptitude.