The Global War on Terrorism

"Global" includes the "homeland" here in America

Posted on

Reprinted from Bracing Views with the author’s permission.

There’s an important point about America’s Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) that people often miss.

When the Bush/Cheney administration announced the GWOT after 9/11, I think nearly all Americans assumed that "global" meant everywhere but the "good" countries. That global meant the axis of evil (Iraq, Iran, North Korea) and similar so-called bad actors, but that it didn’t mean countries like Canada – and certainly not the U.S. homeland.

But global really did mean everywhere on earth as we’ve watched the war on terror escalate domestically. The US government/security state has built the foundation and superstructure for a permanent war on terror, and it simply isn’t going to go away. The Iraq and Afghan wars are essentially over (both lost), and fears of North Korea have subsided as the military-industrial-congressional complex focuses on Ukraine, Russia, and China, but the GWOT continues. It’s now turned inwards, within and along our own borders, and those techniques that were practiced (if not perfected) in Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere are now being used and inflicted upon ordinary Americans who are attempting to resist state-corporate authoritarianism.

The GWOT has come home – but perhaps it’s always been here. What’s changed is how state-corporate entities can define almost any form of determined protest – even civil and nonviolent ones – as "terror." Labeling someone a “domestic terrorist” gives state-corporate actors a whole host of powerful ways to punish activists, notes by Michael Gould-Wartofsky at TomDispatch.com.

At the same time, America has witnessed the “rise of the warrior-cop,” as Radley Balko noted in his book by that title.

Three years ago, I wrote about the militarization of police forces at TomDispatch. This is what I wrote then:

America’s violent overseas wars, thriving for almost two decades despite their emptiness, their lack of meaning, have finally and truly come home. An impoverished empire, in which violence and disease are endemic, is collapsing before our eyes. “When the looting starts, the shooting starts,” America’s self-styled wartime president [Donald Trump] promised, channeling a racist Miami police chief from 1967. It was a declaration meant to turn any American who happened to be near a protest into a potential victim

As such demonstrations proliferate, Americans now face a grim prospect: the chance to be wounded or killed, then dismissed as “collateral damage.” In these years, that tried-and-false military euphemism has been applied so thoughtlessly to innumerable innocents who have suffered grievously from our unending foreign wars and now it’s coming home.

A few days ago, The Onion, a satirical news site, compared America’s obedience and passivity to power to the current situation in France. Here’s how they put it:

In an ongoing struggle against ruling-class oppression, the people of France again protested in a way that Americans are welcome to at any time, sources confirmed Thursday. According to reports, French citizens across the country were spotted hitting the streets en masse as a unified front against the institutional bondage that seeks to subjugate them while never failing to apply forceful pressure every time injustice strikes, which Americans can and should feel free to do whenever they so choose.

Yes, but are Americans truly “welcome” to protest “whenever they so choose”? We’d like to think so, especially as July 4th approaches (America! Land of the Free!), but who wants to be detained and thrown in jail for domestic terrorism? Anyone in America hankering to be labeled as a terrorist by the state, whether on the right or left of the political spectrum, even if the charge is eventually dismissed?

Searing photo of state violence at Kent State in 1970. The dead student’s name was Jeffrey Miller. The young woman crouched in shock and horror was Mary Ann Vecchio. Richard Nixon called the protesters “bums.” What would the state call them today – domestic terrorists?

Remember those innocent days of the 1960s when for some the police were “pigs” and the protesters were “bums” (Richard Nixon’s word for the students killed at Kent State)? Now those protesters could be charged with domestic terrorism even as various heavily armed enforcers of the law would likely be celebrated (consider all those “blue lives matter” flags, for example).

Remember when “defund the police” was briefly a thing? By which people meant less funding for militarized police forces and more for mental health services and the like. President Joe Biden and the Democrats realized any serious effort to restrain police power would leave them open to charges of being soft on crime, so Biden and the party simply declared: Fund the police. (Republicans concur, of course, even as they still accuse Biden and the Dems of being soft on crime.)

And there you have it. Fund the police at all levels, local, state, and federal, and grant them the kind of powers given to America’s “warriors” in the GWOT. Set them loose on all of America’s domestic “terrorists.” After all, the GWOT went so well in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Yemen, and elsewhere. Surely it will go equally well in the Homeland. Right?

Addendum: In writing this, I came across a superb article by Patricia McCormick at the Washington Post on Mary Ann Vecchio, “the girl in the Kent State photo.” She was just 14 when the above photo was taken. She paid a high price, as the article recounts. Letters to her family accused her of being a “drug addict,” a “tramp,” or a “communist.” The then-governor of Florida suggested she was a “professional agitator” and therefore responsible for the students’ deaths. A Gallup poll back then, cited by McCormick, said that 58% of Americans blamed the students at Kent State and only 11% blamed the National Guardsmen who opened fire and killed the four students.

“Professional agitator” sounds much like today’s domestic terrorist. And let’s reflect on those 58% of Americans who believed the students at Kent State were responsible for their own deaths. How dare they block the free flight of “Made in USA” bullets with their young bodies? The “bums”! (“Domestic terrorists.”)

William J. Astore is a retired lieutenant colonel (USAF). He taught history for fifteen years at military and civilian schools. He writes at Bracing Views.

7 thoughts on “The Global War on Terrorism”

  1. March 26, 2023 U.S. Regime Has Killed 20-30 Million People Since World War II

    This study reveals that U.S. military forces were directly responsible for about 10 to 15 million deaths during the Korean and Vietnam Wars and the two Iraq Wars.The Korean War also includes Chinese deaths while the Vietnam War also includes fatalities in Cambodia and Laos.

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/u-s-regime-has-killed-20-30-million-people-since-world-war-ii/5633111

    http://global-politics.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/vietnam-war.jpg

    Mar 9, 2021 Gravitas: Why does the US military have 800 bases in 80 countries?

    The US Military is said to have 800 military sites in around 80 countries. Why does the US need so many military bases? WION’s Palki Sharma tells you more about the American military’s presence overseas.

    https://youtu.be/caCoGLudysY

    1. The US has turned much of the world into killing fields. The GWOT (Global War On Terror) should be called the Global War To Cause Terror since that is what it does.
      The National Guardsmen at Kent State University shot the protesters, they did the same thing China did to the protesters at Tiananmen Square in 1989.
      The US calls itself “The Land of The Free and The Home of The Brave”. The War on Terror has made us less free over the years. I wish more people were brave enough to protest the wars at the White House.
      Trump was good about his peace talks with North Korea and saying US Bases abroad were not necessary and foreign countries should pay to keep US Bases there if they want them there. He was bad about his drone strike in Iran, scrapping the Iran Deal, continuing sanctions against Syria, Venezuela, rolling back trade and travel with Cuba and recognizing Guaido as Venezuela’s president.

      1. The single war party for the Bankster’s will be our demise in the end after our collapse.

      2. Foreign countries DO pay for us to be there. Monetarily, and, by being signatory to the Status of Forces, which mandates that they clean up our messes. It also means that any serviceman/woman who commits a crime will not be prosecuted in the country where the crime was committed, but will be tried in the U.S. before a military tribunal, where the conviction rate is quite low.

        Yes Mr. Trump was good at talk. Still is. He is also bad for suggesting that the CIA abduct Julian Assange, then kill him.

  2. Mary Ann Vecchio was not a protestor on that day of infamy, May 4, 1970. She was (and is) a victim. Turned in by a journalist. A journalist! The treatment she received through the years really, really p*sses me off. All of us could be the next Mary Ann Vecchio.

Comments are closed.