Our Rotten Foreign Policy Status Quo

Perry Bacon probably speaks for many Americans that don’t follow U.S. foreign policy closely and are then shocked by how terrible it can be:

Like a lot of Americans, I don’t follow foreign affairs as closely as I probably should. I have generally assumed that the United States, particularly with Biden in office, plays a largely positive role abroad. Watching senior US. officials adopt a deeply flawed approach and then make misleading statements about it has made me more worried and skeptical of America’s actions in other parts of the world. If Team Biden is this disingenuous about what’s happening in Gaza, should I trust its words about Ukraine, Sudan or China?

Most Americans pay little attention to how our government acts around the world, but when people in this country are directly confronted with how dangerous and destructive US policies can be they are often appalled. There are many cases where the cruelty of US policies goes unseen by most of the public, and so those policies don’t meet with much criticism and opposition. The frequent use of broad sanctions to attack the people of other countries is one example of this, but we also saw how US backing for the war on Yemen went on for years before there was significant pressure to end our government’s involvement. Greater public scrutiny is no guarantee that monstrous policies will end, but it makes it harder for the government to maintain the status quo.

The war in Gaza is shining a spotlight on just how morally and strategically bankrupt the US approach to Israel and Palestine has been for decades, and it also shines a light on the crimes that our government enables through its support for client governments. It might be too much to hope that this wakes a lot of Americans up to the harm that our foreign policy does around the world every day, but there is no question that it exposes the rottenness of the status quo. There are occasionally moments when the public sees the extent of this rottenness and demands something better, and we may be witnessing something like that with the backlash against this war.

Read the rest of the article at Eunomia

Daniel Larison is a contributing editor for Antiwar.com and maintains his own site at Eunomia. He is former senior editor at The American Conservative. He has been published in the New York Times Book Review, Dallas Morning News, World Politics Review, Politico Magazine, Orthodox Life, Front Porch Republic, The American Scene, and Culture11, and was a columnist for The Week. He holds a PhD in history from the University of Chicago, and resides in Lancaster, PA. Follow him on Twitter.