Trump and the Warmongers

Reprinted from Bracing Views with the author’s permission.

Trump and the war hawks. Or war sluts. Or war pigs. I thought about all three of these. Then I thought: Why insult hawks, sluts, or pigs?

Donald Trump is forming his cabinet by rounding up the usual warmongers. In 2016, he gathered the generals, men like James Mattis and John Kelly. This time around, he’s tapping people like Marco Rubio. “Little Marco” as Secretary of State, a man who’s rarely met a war he didn’t like. For Secretary of Defense he’s nominated Pete Hegseth, whose main concern seems to be waging a war on “woke” generals. One thing is certain: Rubio and Hegseth won’t challenge the military-industrial complex. They will feed it… and feed it again.

Other nominations include Elise Stefanik, a rabid Zionist, as UN ambassador, along with Mike Huckabee, a pro-Israel evangelical who believes in the “end times,” as U.S. ambassador to Israel. Trump may trump Biden as being more slavishly pro-Israel. “Bombs for Bibi to kill babies” should be their motto.

Kristi Noem, who shot and killed her own dog because she couldn’t train it, will run Homeland Security. (If you work for DHS, it might be a good idea to watch your back, or at least to avoid being alone with Noem at a gravel pit.) Mike Waltz will be the National Security Advisor; here’s how Caitlin Johnstone describes him:

Waltz is a warmongering freak. Journalist Michael Tracey has been filling up his Twitter page since the announcement with examples of Waltz’s insane hawkishness, including his support for letting Ukraine use US weapons to strike deep into Russian territory, criticizing Biden for not escalating aggressively enough in Ukraine, advocating bombing Iran, opposing the US military withdrawal from Afghanistan, and naming Iran, North Korea, China, Russia and Venezuela as “on the march” against the United States toward global conflict. The mainstream press are calling Waltz a “China hawk”, but from the look of things he’s a war-horny hawk toward all the official enemies of the United States. 

Once again, Trump isn’t draining the swamp. He’s filling it with warmongers and Zionists who are even more extreme than the warmongers and Zionists of the Biden administration.

Of course, the fundamental problem is that Republicans want to boost military spending even higher than Biden and Harris have.  Republicans are “all in” on revamping the nuclear triad, for example, which is likely to cost $2 trillion factoring in the usual cost overruns.

It’s possible Trump/Vance will be more likely to pursue diplomacy with Russia; perhaps the war in Ukraine will finally stumble to an end. But the imperial vision remains, aggravated perhaps by a war within to expel “illegal” immigrants, together with a coup within the military against “woke” officers.

That sounds pessimistic.  If I’m being optimistic, perhaps Trump can have a “Nixon goes to China” moment.  Trump can sell virtually anything to his followers. He is also driven by ego.  Maybe there’s a way to drive him toward peace, dangling the carrot of a Nobel Peace Prize for him.  Trump loves accolades, and if he could be influenced to stop throwing all of America’s chips into the Pentagon, that would be a good thing.

But, if personnel is policy, America had better prepare for more war, catastrophically so, even as more bombs are sent to Bibi to kill babies. There’s certainly nothing “woke” about that.

William Astore, a retired lieutenant colonel (USAF) and history professor, is a senior fellow at the Eisenhower Media Network (EMN), an organization of critical veteran military and national security professionals. He writes at Bracing Views.

9 thoughts on “Trump and the Warmongers”

  1. It's those who paid to get a president elected who get to decide his policies. As an example is the joke of putting Elon Musk in charge of cutting the budget when Musk is one of the biggest beneficiary of the federal government largesse.

    1. I don't get your point. Are you completely ignoring the names mentioned in this article? And Trump escalated every war that was in progress in his first term, but that empty column still looks good. At least to his cult members.

      1. I am looking at who he is putting in place, and also adding his past record for insights. I am not a mind reader, but I do know how to look at actions. He invaded zero countries and peace was breaking out all across the Middle East. I observe and take notes.

        1. I won't go into what he did in the wars he inherited. I've posted that ad nauseum. And what else did he inherit when he took office? An agreement, the JCCPOA, which was the equivalent to the NPT on steroids that Iran was in full compliance with. By the time he left office we were damn near at war with Iran. The Abraham Accords were bribes to play nice with Israel. Nothing more than another attempt to isolate Iran. Your idea of actual peace and mine differ, I guess.

    2. The only reasons Trump didn't start any new wars (and he almost did with Iran) was because 1) he spent the first two years fighting the claim that he was a Russian agent, and 2) then Covid came in and everyone was too busy fighting that to fight each other.

  2. This Administration is going to start at least two more Wars, while making more Unpaid for Tax cuts.
    For you 'R' Voters that means more $pending& less income.

Comments are closed.