Recruiting SHENANIGANS

St. Petersburg Times
Mom ferrets out truth on Guard duty

By HOWARD TROXLER, Times Columnist
troxler@sptimes.com

Published February 10, 2005

Laramie Misner was surprised when her daughter Kelsie, a 17-year-old
senior at Dunedin High School, came home on the evening of Jan. 7 saying
she wanted to join the Florida National Guard.

Misner listened with growing worry when Kelsie told her that a Guard
recruiter had visited school that day. Kelsie said the recruiter
promised not only that the Guard would pay college tuition, but also
that she would not have to leave Florida.

It is absolutely true the Florida National Guard will pay college
tuition at a Florida school.
But it is absolutely not the case that recruits can be guaranteed to
remain in Florida or even the United States. At this moment, 700 to 800
of Florida’s almost 10,000 Guard members are serving honorably in Iraq,
Afghanistan and Kuwait.

Yet other students at Dunedin High School thought they heard the
recruiter say this, too, and some of them signed up. If you are 18 you
can sign for yourself, but if you’re 17 your folks have to sign too. Continue reading “Recruiting SHENANIGANS”

The Pentagon Channel

I’d like to thank the Pentagon for providing yet another in a seemingly endless string of great material on which to comment. The Nazis had Leni Riefenstahl to make their propaganda, and now the US has … The Pentagon Channel (I didn’t make that name up; that’s what they’re calling it). That’s right, the symbol of US Empire is now going to be broadcasting to millions of US homes free of charge!
The channel is marketed thusly; “Dish viewers will be kept up to date with current military news and information including Department of Defense news briefings, military news, interviews with top defense officials, and short stories about the work of military people.”
Yes, I can see how that might be necessary. The Fox/CNN cretins don’t do much of that, do they? We need BALANCE against those anti-war forces!
This opens up a number of intriguing possibilities, does it not? How about a new reality show – Rummy’s World – in which the camera follows the Defense Secretary around as he berates and fires subordinates, eats breakfast, argues with the President about whether Mr. Bush should be reading the memos coming from DoD, and disseminates intelligence to try to find something positive to tell the press.
And since Rumsfeld is apparently a sex symbol, how about a contest – Win a date with Rummy. That’ll attract the soccer moms, I’ll tell you.
How about a nightly news broadcast hosted by Robert McNamara?
Or an infomercial – How to shred sensitive documents before the press or congress get their grubby hands on them. The Pentagon could start marketing its own brand of shredder, only $19.95.
Then there are the shows I’m sure we will not be seeing on this channel; Great US War criminals from Wilson to Bush, Why the Defense Department isn’t called the War Department anymore, A history of disastrously failed US Military Vehicles, and how much they cost, and even Lying us into war: How the Feds have dummied up a reason for every war the US has fought.
Those shows will be reserved someday for the Antiwar.com channel.

Chomsky on Iran

Noam Chomsky gave a talk (broadband Real Video link) at Columbia University’s Earth Institute, on November 16, 2004, and during the question period, this exchange took place;


Q. “Could you think of or imagine any form or shape in which you might support American military action which is taken in anticipation of – like the present justification – of an imminent and dangerous threat to the United States?
Can you conceive of any form in which you might support such action?”

NC. “Why don’t you generalize it? And say can you conceive of any action which any state might take?
Yeah sure, you can imagine such things, i mean let’s say you’re in Iran right now … [laughter from crowd] Iran is, uh, I mean there’s a real problem, Iran is – first of all Iran is under attack by the world’s superpower, with embargoes, this that and the other thing; it’s surrounded by states either occupied by its superpower enemy, or having nuclear weapons. A little way down the road, is the regional superpower, which has hundreds of nuclear weapons, and other weapons of mass destruction and is, essentially, an offshore US military base, and has the biggest air force, and technologically most advanced air force in NATO, more than any NATO power (outside the United States), and in the past year, has been supplied by the global superpower with a hundred advanced jet bombers, openly advertised as able to fly to Iran and back to bomb it; and also provided (I’m talking about Israel) [laughter from crowd] with what the Hebrew press calls “special weaponry”. Well, nobody knows what that means, but if if you’re an Iranian intelligence analyst, you’re going to give a worst case analysis of it, of course; and has actually been publicly provided with smart bombs and deep penetration weapons and so on. I mean they have a terrific case for anticipatory self-defense – better than any other case I can think of, but do I approve of it? Like, do I approve of their bombing Israel, or carrying out terrorist acts in Washington or so on? no. Even though they have a pretty strong case. Better than anything I can think of here, just as the Japanese had a much better case than any I can think of here, but I don’t approve of Pearl Harbor; so yeah, we can conceive of cases, and in fact, some of them are right in front of our eyes, but none of us approve of them. None of us.

Chomsky goes on to say;

“And in fact, the threat of terror and weapons of mass destruction is very severe, very severe, and the Bush administration, like the Clinton administration, doesn’t care about it. In fact, they are acting, consciously, in ways to increase the threat.

If you want to listen to this exchange, move the slider near the 1:02:13 mark, although the entire talk is well worthwhile.