Warbloggers: suckers for the “MSM”

Hortonmassey_1

Arthur Silber on the warblogger pile-on to the scurrilous attack on Jimmy Massey’s credibility by St. Louis Post Dispatch reporter Ron “Embedded” Harris. (and welcome back Arthur, you were missed.)

From the AWC blog archives, here’s Scott Horton on his interview with Massey at Camp Casey in Crawford last August. (Scott and Jimmy photo to the left) And, here’s Scott’s interview with Jimmy Massey and Tim Goodrich from October 15, 2005.

Funny how the warblogs, so enamored of screaming BIAS! at the “MSM” were so keen to buy this story.

Judy Miller “retires” from the NYT

UPDATE: Judy, Judy, Judy, looking for hits already! Here’s Judy Miller’s "Farewell Letter" and embedded within it is a link to her website, all stocked and ready to go with rebuttals to everyone who’s been mean to her lately.

Judith Miller retires from New York Times

E & P has more details:

Under the terms of the separation, Miller will write a farewell letter to the editor, to be published in Thursday’s paper. Another condition of the split required Keller to share a letter with the paper’s staff clarifying his controversial remarks about her “entanglement” with I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, the former White House official indicted in the CIA leak investigation.

“In her 28 years at The Times, Judy participated in some great, prize-winning journalism,” Keller wrote to the staff. “She displayed fierce determination and personal courage both in pursuit of the news and in resisting assaults on the freedom of news organizations to report. We wish her well in the next phase of her career.”

Publisher Arthur Sulzberger Jr., said in a statement, “We are grateful to Judy for her significant personal sacrifice to defend an important journalistic principle. I respect her decision to retire from The Times and wish her well.”

Miller’s lawyers and the paper had been negotiating a severance package for the last two weeks, although they had declined to discuss specific terms of the deal. An article posted on the Times’ Web site Wednesday afternoon outlined the broad terms: “Under the agreement, Ms. Miller will retire from the newspaper, and The Times will print a letter she wrote to the editor explaining her position,” wrote Katharine Q. Seelye. “Ms. Miller originally demanded that she be able to write an essay for the paper’s Op-Ed page refuting the allegations against her, the lawyers said. The Times refused that demand — Gail Collins, editor of the editorial page, said, ‘We don’t use the Op-Ed page for back and forth between one part of the paper and another’ — but agreed to let her to write the letter.”

More here.

“Enemy combatants” and welcoming Chalabi

From TalkLeft:

Breaking: Senator Lindsay Graham is introducing an Amendment to the defense appropriations bill pending in the Senate (S. 1092) that would strip those designated by the Administration as enemy combatants of the ability to seek habeas review in federal courts. This is an end-run around the Supreme Court’s decision in U.S. v. Rasul which held Guantanamo detainees have the right to challenge the legality of their detentions.
[..]
This would effectively end all litigation brought on behalf of the detainees at Guantanamo Bay, as well as any future litigation on behalf of those imprisoned at the CIA secret detention camps. This bill is intended to have retroactive application.
However, you can rest assured that this measure won’t affect anyone important, right, George and Dick?

Steve Clemons at The Washington Note:

CHALABI News Flash: Congressman & Senator Call for Him to be Subpoenaed

Just got word that Congressman George Miller and Senator Richard Durbin, in a joint news conference later TODAY, will be calling for Ahmad Chalabi to be subpoenaed.

Good call.

More Fun With Chalabi.

Republican implosion over torture gulags

An interesting torture story developing today. From publius:

According to Drudge (always a shaky way to start), Frist and Hastert are going to announce an investigation not into our mini-gulag in Eastern Europe, but into the leak of the black sites to the Post.

This is EXACTLY why the Espionage Act should be read in the way that I read it. By roping Libby within its scope, you give the government a perfect weapon to punish all unfavorable reporting on national security issues. Inevitably, people will abuse the power – because that’s what people tend to do. An expansive reading of the Espionage Act will remove a check to corrupt and illegal practices – which is precisely what Frist and Hastert (surely at the direction of others) are trying to do.

Then, here’s digby:
Whole Lotta Love

Wow. CNN is reporting that Trent Lott just said that the Washington Post leak was probably perpetrated by a Republican Senator! Apparently, the gulag was discussed at the Republican-Senator-only meeting last week in which Cheney begged them to back-off the anti-torture policy.

Lott said, “we have met the enemy and he is us.” Man a majority leader scorned is fearsome creature, ain’t he?

I do find it fascinating that Cheney was discussing this Gulag opernly in front of the GOP caucus after they had just recently voted 90-0 for the anti-torture amendment. Seems old Dick is a little slow on the uptake. He didn’t learn a thing from his earlier leaking campaign, did he?

Think Progress has the video.

Related: Fox News: “Why All The Fuss About Torturing People?”