David Beito

The Military Industrial Consequence: Historian ranks FDR near top of worst presidents list

History professor David Beito discusses the history of America’s empire and some of the movements that have opposed it.

MP3 here. (42: 32)

David T. Beito is Associate Professor at the University of Alabama. He received his Ph.D. in history at the University of Wisconsin in 1986. Professor Beito is the author of Taxpayers in Revolt: Tax Resistance during the Great Depression and From Mutual Aid to the Welfare state: Fraternal Societies and Social Services, 1890-1967. An urban and social historian, he has published in the Journal of Southern History, and the Journal of Urban History, among other scholarly journals. He is currently writing a biography of Dr. T. R. M. Howard, a black civil rights pioneer, entrepreneur, and mutual-aid leader.

Eric Margolis

Occupying Afghanistan Never Works: Not even when America does it

Veteran war correspondent Eric Margolis discusses the war in Afghanistan, the “enemy” pashtuns and our “allies” the Tajiks and Uzbeks who fought on the side of the Soviet Union back when the U.S. backed the pashtuns against them, the shaky status of America’s puppet dictator in Pakistan, that countries relationship with India, the current chances for peace in the Israel/Palestinian conflict, the chances of war between Israel and Syria and of America with Iran.

MP3 here. (18: 37)

Award winning author, columnist, and broadcaster Eric S. Margolis has covered 14 wars and is a leading authority on military affairs, the Middle East, South Asia, and Islamic movements.

Notes and Asides

I have noted the growing convergence of left and right on various issues, from the war in Iraq to the fight in defense of civil liberties on the home front, and here’s another proposition that is a part of this developing left-right consensus: the rise of Jonah Goldberg as a right-wing commentator points to a qualitative degeneration of American conservatism. Yes, it’s “Goldbergism and the Decline of the Right,” the latest installment of my column for Taki’s Top Drawer.

I have to say that I really get a kick out of reading as well as writing for Taki Theodoracopulos’ spanking new website, because I get venture into topics I wouldn’t normally cover in this space, and I can frankly tell you that I enjoy the opportunity to let my hair down, so to speak, and write about what amuses me rather than what needs to be written about. Over the last few days I’ve done two radio interviews: go check out my appearance on Jim Ostrowski’s new radio show on WNYmedia.net, and yet another interview with our very own Scott Horton, on Antiwar.com Radio. Regarding the latter: well, yes, I was a little … loquacious, shall we say, but then again everybody has days like that, don’t they …? Well, maybe not quite like that …

I also have a new piece coming out soon in The American Conservative on the upcoming trial of Steve Rosen and Keith Weissman, two employees of AIPAC charged with passing U.S. secrets to Israel. I’m not sure if the editors are going to put it online – and, yes, I’m urging you once again to subscribe to TAC.

Bureau of Emotion Issues New Diktat

I’ll grant that he makes a couple of reasonable nano-points along the way, but Christopher Hitchens’ latest essay is mostly a chilling reminder of his inner rot. Quoth Commissar Chris of the bloodbath in Blacksburg:

The grisly events at Virginia Tech involved no struggle, no sacrifice, no great principle. They were random and pointless. Those who died were not soldiers in any cause. They were not murdered by our enemies. They were not martyrs.

Quit your whimpering, bourgeois vermin! We have the world to win!

Of course, Hitchens allows for exceptions:

At times of real crisis and genuine emergency, such as the assault on our society that was mounted almost six years ago, some emotion could be pardoned.

Up to and including losing one’s goddamn mind, apparently.

Last month, IOZ summed up Hitchens better than anyone else has.

Bushian Thinking Infects the Drug War

Nearly every day there’s a story about Bush or some other official (not to mention the embarrassingly ridiculous John McCain) claiming sectarian violence is dropping, Baghdad is safer, Iraq is “making progress.” But periodically throughout the war, usually when there is a spike in violence, we hear that such spikes are a good thing, because it signals that all is not well with the insurgency, and that they are “desperate” and “worried.” Well such omelette-making (and anti-logical) thinking has bled into the office of the drug czar.

This morning over my waffles and café con leche, I read in Men’s Vogue a piece titled “A Budding Invasion.” I was instantly annoyed by the embedded reporter, official line-toeing tone of the article (“cartel henchmen,” “growers leave an eco-disaster,” “Can anyone halt the harvest?”), but what really caught my eye was this bit:

“Gruesome violence afflicts Michoacán—stomping grounds of some of the cartels that dominate the American marijuana market—where cartel henchmen have lately developed a partiality for leaving human heads, with written warnings attached, outside government offices. Last year they rolled five of them onto a discotheque dance floor….The bloodshed is dismaying, but [Deputy Drug Czar Scott] Burns sees it as a potentially promising sign. ‘The violence can be an indication of many things, such as disrupting the cartels,’ he says. ‘If everything is running smoothly, there’s no reason to shoot somebody. It can be an indication of good work by the Mexican and U.S. governments.’

Got that? The more heads roll onto Uruapan’s dance floors, the better Burnsie sleeps at night because he takes it as a sign that he is doing his job better. That job? To tell adult Americans what kind of plants they can ingest. A true hero.

Congress Rubberstamps Martial Law

Congress amended the Insurrection Act last September to make it far easier for the president to declare martial law. I go into the cheery details in a piece in the April 23 issue of the American Conservative:

How many pipe bombs might it take to end American democracy? Far fewer than it would have taken a year ago.

The Defense Authorization Act of 2006, passed on Sept. 30, empowers President George W. Bush to impose martial law in the event of a terrorist “incident,” if he or other federal officials perceive a shortfall of “public order,” or even in response to antiwar protests that get unruly as a result of government provocations.

The full text of the piece is posted at my blog here, where comments & caterwaulings are welcome.