Antiwar.com Blog

It seems that there are quite a few troops held over in Iraq that have worse problems than still lacking the body armor they were supposed to get and haven’t yet. Some of them don’t have anything at all.

23 News has learned that the 333rd Military Police Unit in Freeport, which just had their tour in Iraq extended, may not be adequately supplied for battle.
That’s because everything they own was shipped back home. The 333rd is presently sitting on the Kuwaiti border awaiting orders, but they have since surrendered their equipment, such as radios and armored vehicles to the troops who replaced them.

But now since the 333rd is going to remain in Iraq they are without any supplies. Even their personal belongings were sent home, including spare uniforms, boots and toiletries.

The soldiers only have what they are wearing and are being forced to purchase new uniforms and some equipment out of their own pockets. Military families have been receiving their soldier’s footlockers the past few days and are now frantically re packing boxes and sending all of this gear back at their own expense.

This has angered families who don’t believe the military thought this redeployment through. And they have caught he ear of some politicians.

“How demoralizing it is to be promised that this was over and that they’re finally coming home and they’re finally going to get back to their life as usual and then to have the rug pulled out from under them and it’s happened time and time and time again. Extremely poor planning by the department of defense, said Senator Dick Durbin, D-Illinois.

Great planning, Rummy! You’re handling this “extension” about as well as you’ve handled the occupation. Oh, wait, that’s Condi’s job.

Here’s a military wife, writing from Germany:

I am the wife of a soldier who was just officially extended yesterday. He has been in Iraq for nearly one year. He has proudly served his tour, and we were planning for his arrival home next week. Here’s a true story. A group of soldiers from his unit went to BIAP to wait for their return flight to Germany, where we are based. They were turned away and told that they were being kept in Iraq indefinitely. On the way back to their base in Baghdad proper, they were ambushed. The unit had their first casualty that night. My husband should have been with them, as he is one of their medics, but he was supposed to drive the ambulance to Kuwait the next day, so they told him to stay back and get some rest. I am sickened by this whole betrayal of trust and abuse of our volunteers. If Bush and Co. get reelected, start moving your military age men to Canada, because the draft will be reinstated. Nobody deserves this kind of a back stabbing. Least of all the men and women who have signed up to protect our country. This extension was a death sentence for that poor soldier. This extension cost three children their father. And it will cost much more. And now, to touchstone: My husband signed up so that he could go to college. If we would have forseen this, there is no way that he would have put his name on that dotted line. He has missed the birth of his third child…..he could die out there. He’s supposed to be sitting safe in Kuwait right now, but instead, he’s in a tent because their barracks were taken over by 1st Cavalry soldiers who went in to replace them. They haven’t got enough food right now, because there are too many soldiers on that base, and DoD was too short sighted to think that they might end up needing more troops. All their stuff is out to sea at the time being, so they are just sitting ducks waiting for their equipment to come back. This is a fiasco and a logistical nightmare. DoD and Rummy have been denying that there is a troop shortage for MONTHS! General Shinseki predicted this and was forced to retire. In November, Senator McCain called for at least 15,000 more troops. Well, shucks, seems they were right after all. I pray that John Kerry wins this election. It’s so important to vote this year.

Doing all I can from Germany!

Oh, yeah, that’s how to Support Our Troops.^TM Apparently they’re just numbers.

General: We need 20,000 more troops in Iraq.

Rumsfeld: No problemo! We got your 20,000 right here!

General: With underwear and socks and everything.

Rumsfeld: Isn’t there a WalMart in Baghdad?

The saga continues. Boudreaux says the image is doctored; the Marine Corps has “reopened” the case. If the Corps reopened the case after Boudreaux screamed foul play, that indicates to me that the initial investigation (the results of which have not been released) found him guilty–though, of course, the Pentagon has been wrong about a few things within recent memory.

Thanks to Tex for the link.

ANTI – IRAQI FORCES FIRE ON MARINES FROM MOSQUE

This is an actual headline from a “Centcom” press release. Think about this for a minute. “Anti-Iraqi” forces fired on Marines from a mosque? What the hell are “anti-Iraqi” forces? Why would an anti-iraqi person care about firing on marines? Wouldn’t they fire on Iraqis? The Iraqis they’re “anti?”

Who do these morons in Centcorn think they’re fooling. What stupendous arrogance.

If you’d like to know more about warbloggers, Salam, Zeyad, etc., from today’s column, I recommend these two pieces, one from shortly after the Lileks debacle and another from two weeks ago. I was going to include both in the essay, but I’m trying to be conscientious about over-linking–some people have made their annoyance known.

Spanish Troops Withdrawing Now

Jose Bono, speaking after the new government’s first cabinet meeting, said that the process had already started.

He said that a plan was in operation and would “conclude swiftly”.

Another account:

Bono revealed after the new Socialist government’s first cabinet meeting that the pullout operation was under way.

“We already have an operative plan,” Bono said, adding that the troops would return “as soon as possible and with maximum security. The process has started and will conclude swiftly.”

Today is the 11th anniversary of our government’s brutal gassing and incineration of “its own people” at Waco, TX, for the crime of exercising their Constitutional rights. With that in mind, Vice President Cheney’s address to the National Rifle Association on Saturday is worth noting.

I watched the speech on C-Span, mainly to gauge the crowd’s reaction. The Bush administration, after all, has done all the things NRA folks hissed at the Clintons for, but on a much larger scale: erosion of civil liberties through the PATRIOT Act, support for the extension of the “assault weapons” ban, not to mention the world’s largest and bloodiest act of coercive disarmament since the days of Stalin and Hitler. So what were the attendees chanting? “Four more years! Four more years!”

I have no illusions about the NRA, having quit the group long ago. Contrary to liberal myth, the NRA is at best a Jello bulwark against gun control. They eventually cave to every new gun law and plead for tougher enforcement of every old one. They give money to candidates (usually incumbents, especially Republicans) for no reason other than to bolster their “success” rate. They have even bullied the most ardently pro-gun member of the U.S. Congress for sticking to Constitutional principles.

But as I listened to the raucous cheering for Cheney–curiously, he spent about two minutes talking about guns, an hour saluting state aggression– it became clear that, far from being even a tiny impediment to statism, the NRA is an accomplice in it. Those of you who support the NRA financially should be aware of what you’re buying. You could join the far better Gun Owners of America and send the $15 bucks you save on membership fees to us. Just a thought.