Antiwar.com Blog

Eric’s entry on Tim Starr got me to thinking: Who is the most obnoxious “libertarian” hawk? The most reasonable? On the latter question I’m taking a cue from Alan Bock’s thoughtful comments of last Tuesday and attempting a little holiday civility. I guess I’ll nominate Ronald Bailey for most reasonable; his pro-war arguments don’t impress me, but at least he isn’t a full-time Bush hack.

For most obnoxious… where to begin? I’ll go ahead and nominate Glenn Reynolds, Virginia Postrel, and Neal Boortz— but those are pretty obvious, no? E-mail with seconds and other nominations. Include a link, if possible, and a short explanation for your choice.

From the January issue of the national Libertarian Party News (not yet posted on their website):

LP Hawks Start ‘Fight for Liberty’ Caucus

A Washington state Libertarian Party member has helped found an organization of “libertarian hawks” that will encourage the LP to support a more aggressive defense policy against terrorists.

The group, Fight for Liberty, “recognizes the need for a powerful military, whether private or state, to vanquish the terror movement,” said Kevin Bjornson, an LP Life Member and former chair of the West King County LP.

The group supports a “victory over terrorism,” and opposes Libertarians who would “shrink the U.S. military to dangerous weakness,” he said.

The current LP platform, which calls for a non-interventionist foreign policy, the withdrawal of American military troops stationed abroad, and an end to foreign aid, is either “insanity or merely ridiculous,” said Bjornson.

Fight for Liberty has passed a six-point program that advocates allowing Iraqis to have AK-47s, privatizing the Iraqi Oil Industry, legalizing drugs for U.S. adults, charging allies for NATO-type defense services, preventing the “theocratic/terror state of Iran” from developing nuclear weapons, and encouraging the “establishment of secular, rational government[s]” around the world.

Bjornson said Fight for Liberty will post foreign policy analyses, offer speakers for libertarian supper clubs and conferences, and serve as a “central posting board” for hawkish libertarians.

(bold type added for emphasis)

---

One of the early members of the new group is Tim Starr, a (now-former) San Francisco Bay Area Libertarian Party member (an “anarcho-hawk”) who advocates having the government pursue an interventionist foreign policy until it is abolished.

Dear Friends,

Today is the last day to make a donation to Antiwar.com that you can deduct from your 2003 US federal taxable income.

If you itemize your deductions, you are allowed to deduct 100% of your donations to Antiwar.com from your taxable income.

Don’t miss this opportunity!

Thank you very much for the support of all of you.

Eric Garris
Webmaster, Antiwar.com

While the War Party cheerfully celebrates the holiday season attending galas and fundraisers, the forgotten wounded deal with the prospects of a New Year very different from the last they celebrated.

A Soldier’s Return
Since the war started, more than 2,300 American soldiers in Iraq have been hurt in combat, many by artillery shells and homemade bombs that spray shrapnel. Bulletproof vests and helmets protect vital organs. But as the insurgency continues, doctors say that severe facial injuries, along with wounds to the arms and legs, are becoming a hallmark of this war.

Sgt. Jeremy Feldbusch, a fit, driven, highly capable Army Ranger, left home in February knowing the risks of combat. Two months later, he came home blind.

A growing number of young men and women are returning from Iraq and trying to resume lives that were interrupted by war and then minced by injury. Sergeant Feldbusch, a moody 24-year-old, is one of them, back in a little town in western Pennsylvania, in a little house overlooking trees and snow-blanketed hills he cannot see.

During the two months Jeremy Feldbusch spent recovering at Brooke Army Medical Center in San Antonio, his parents lived at his bedside. Charlene Feldbusch remembers one day seeing a young female soldier crawling past her in the corridor with no legs and her 3-year-old son trailing behind…

Traditional Catholic Reflections & Reports has prominently run Justin Raimondo’s article, Pope John Paul II: Man of the Year.

In their link, they refer to Antiwar.com as Website of the Year (you must scroll down just a little).

Thank you, TCRNews!

Kudos to The Army Times:
Their Photos Tell the Story, by Jimmy Breslin
The Army Times, a civilian newspaper that is sold mainly on military bases and thus reaches the prime wartime audience, uses eight pages of its year-end review, out now, to run photos of all those who have died in Iraq and Afghanistan…

In introducing the pictures, under the headline “Faces of the Fallen,” the Army Times said: “More than 500 service members died in operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom in 2003, a group that represents the full, rich face of American diversity.

“They grew up in big cities like Chicago and New York and small towns like Layton, Utah, and Cross Lanes, West Virginia. Ten were women, the youngest six 18-year-olds barely out of high school. The oldest, Army Sgt. Floyd G. Nightman Jr., was 55.

The chilling photos run at a time when the government tries to describe the war as a civic venture, and nearly all of the news industry doesn’t know how to object. This probably is the worst failure to inform the public that we have seen…

And the dead are brought back here almost furtively. There are no ceremonies or pictures of caskets at Dover, Del., air base, where the dead are brought. “You don’t want to upset the families,” George Bush said. That the people might be slightly disturbed already by the death doesn’t seem to register. The wounded are flown into Washington at night. There are 5,000 of them and for a long time you never heard of soldiers who have no arms and legs…