Letter From Israel
by Ran HaCohen
Antiwar.com
Readers
very often accuse me of not writing about Palestinian terrorism against Israel.
A typical reader writes: "if Israeli gunmen were going in Palestinian
pizza places, weddings, buses, discos, shoe stores and deliberately massacring
Palestinian civilians, Ran HaCohen would go on a tirade against Israel. Yet
he remains silent on Arab terrorism against Israeli civilians." I would
like to relate to this accusation. But before doing that, let me pay a small
tribute to a brave Israeli soldier who refuses to serve in the occupied territories
any longer. The Tel-Aviv weekly Ha'Ir last week printed forty
short evidences of such refusers; here is one of them. Not the most shocking
one. The harder stuff sometimes makes it to the news. But it illustrates some
of the daily, banal routines of occupation, countless similar scenes that
take place every day, every night, in endless variations. And they all count
as "no news".
A
SOLDIER'S STORY
"Jabaliya
(a refugee camp near Gaza). Terrible heat. It's after midnight, we are on
our way to arrest "wanted people" small criminals and tax-evaders
whom the Shin Bet wants to blackmail. We surround the area and storm into
the house. The officer quickly climbs the wall and I, his signalman, close
behind him. We break into the "house": a single small room, blankets
on the floor, four kids aged two to six or seven. They and the parents a
young woman and a not so young man all wake up in panic, weeping and yelling.
They are hysteric, and we, very young soldiers, too. We shout at them to shut
up and at the man to dress up, and "search" the home. There is nothing
to find, nothing to look for. Handcuffs, and out to the lorry. Several arrested
Palestinians have been gathered there, and someone from the Civil Administration
is taking care' of them: slaps in the face, kicking. I want to say something,
but off we go to the Shin Bet camp. The man we have arrested is smashed at
the lorry's floor, weeping, sobbing in fear, with a broken voice, I beg you,
I beg you...'" (written by Sergeant (res.) Yotam Cohen)
ALTRUISM
AND DISTRACTION
Now
back to why I don't write on terrorism. Surprisingly, this accusation comes
mostly from American readers. At first I thought I should be grateful for
this rare token of altruism: Are people living in the US actually more concerned
about my well-being than I am?! But as all too often the complaints ended
with such cordial blessing as "you racist anti-Semite", I gathered
that pure altruism might not be the true motivation. So why do people want
me to talk about terrorism? Surely not because they know too little about
it. As a mourning Palestinian mother said last week, international press would
pay more attention to a Jewish settler's dog injured in a terrorist attack
than to her dead child. Terrorism is the most popular term in Middle East
media coverage, and still people want me to talk about it too. So why? I believe
it is because those people do not want me to talk about another term: occupation.
Note how seldom this term is used when the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is
dealt with. In fact, when you hear someone say "terrorism" over
and over again, you can be certain he won't use the term "occupation".
Terrorism
and Occupation may look like twin brothers. Both are illegitimate: occupation
is acknowledged by international law, but for a limited time, not for 35 years;
resistance to occupation (which is what Palestinian terrorism is about) is
legitimate too, but not when innocent people are targeted. Both are murderous:
innocent Israelis fall victim to terrorism, innocent Palestinians fall victim
to occupation. Terrorism is pervasive: it threatens all Israelis; Occupation
is even more pervasive: all Palestinians are under occupation, and as we have
seen above, while terrorism can get Israelis in pizza places or discos, occupation
visits Palestinians in bed, either by a missile or because some Shin Bet agent
wants to blackmail them into collaboration. Needless to say, the number of
Palestinian victims of the occupation overwhelmingly exceeds the number of
Israeli victims of terrorism if you like, one more reason to talk about
occupation more than terrorism.
Israel,
especially since September 11th but even long before, has been trying to convince
the world that the Palestinian Authority, not just individual Palestinians,
is engaged in terrorism. True or not, the uncontroversial reality is that
the State of Israel, not individual Israelis, is running the occupation. Israel
sometimes claims that the occupation has been forced upon it against its will.
It is one of the most ridiculous claims I have ever heard, but this is actually
what Ehud Barak's celebrated "analytical mind" was trying to sell
us: that because he had supposedly made some "generous offers" to
the Palestinians, and because they had supposedly rejected these offers, Israel
could not stop the occupation. Sounds ridiculous? Ask some Israel fans and
you'll see how seriously they take this joke.
WHY
OCCUPATION?
The
simple fact is that Israel is occupying the territories because it wants to
occupy them. It does not withdraw from them, because it wants to take the
land for settlements, for water and for regional strategic considerations.
It does not annex them, because it does not want to give citizenship to three
million Palestinians. Occupation is the only way to satisfy both aims. It
may be direct occupation, it may be an indirect one: in fact, Israel is generously
offering the Palestinians both options. Israel's present message to Arafat
is expressed clearly and shamelessly: either you comply with the occupation,
or we replace you with some other "leaders" who will. Shimon Peres
prefers the former option, Sharon prefers the latter. They both support the
occupation, they have both done more than any other Israeli politician for
the sake of the Israeli settlements, they differ in tactics but share the
same cause.
ENLIGHTENED
OCCUPATION
Centuries
of colonialism have proved that "an enlightened occupation" is a
contradiction is terms. Occupation cannot be tolerable and therefore cannot
be tolerated. Expecting a people to live without political rights is both
unreasonable and immoral. The occupied Palestinians, in order to get rid of
the occupation, use violence verbal violence, physical violence, violence
against soldiers and settlers and deplorable violence against innocent people.
Thus, the occupation becomes ever more violent and the deprivation of political
rights is inevitably followed by violations of human rights. You cannot oppress
one people for the sake of another without resorting to atrocities. It starts
with exploiting one's weakness (a sick elderly mother, a sick child) to blackmail
one into collaboration, it goes all the way through torture, siege, starving
and killing and it ends in letting a pregnant woman die with her infant at
a checkpoint.
As
Friedrich Schiller said, this is the curse of the evil deed: it inevitably
gives birth to ever more evil. Indeed, Palestinian terrorism has increased
step by step with occupation; the cruelest stage of occupation, with the whole
world singing the praises of Oslo while the settlements were expanding rapidly
and the cantonisation of the territories by checkpoints and highways was advancing
in an unprecedented high pace, gave birth to the appalling phenomenon of Palestinians
whose despair had overwhelmed them to the point of being ready to die in order
to kill their oppressors. Just like the 200,000 settlers, just like the hundreds
of checkpoints, the suicide bombers haven't always been there: they emerged
in a specific historical context.
HOW
TO STOP TERRORISM
So
why don't I talk of terrorism? Because Palestinian Terrorism is not the Occupation's
twin brother, but rather its murderous offspring. Like father, like son. Terrorism
is horrible; but occupation is too, and the former is the result of the latter.
To stop the circle of violence, to stop terrorism, the occupation must stop
first. Since a one-state solution seems unlikely under the present circumstances,
Israel must end the occupation by withdrawing all its forces, dismantling
all its settlements and letting the Palestinians establish a true independent
state in the entire territories occupied in 1967. This is the only way to
uproot terrorism, not bulldozing the Gaza strip or aiming a cannon at imprisoned
Arafat's head.
A contribution of $50 or more will get you a copy of Ronald Radosh's out-of-print classic study of the Old Right conservatives, Prophets on the Right: Profiles of Conservative Critics of American Globalism. Send contributions to
Antiwar.com
520 S. Murphy Avenue, #202
Sunnyvale, CA 94086
or
Contribute Via our Secure Server
Credit Card Donation Form