Bombing Syria ‘Just Enough Not to Get Mocked,’ Or, Where Does America Get Off?

John Glaser, August 28, 2013

Screen Shot 2013-08-28 at 2.10.58 PM

The Obama administration’s case for war against Syria is incredibly thin. That is unsurprising. What is a little bit surprising is that they’re not really even trying to make it more compelling.

As I’ve written, Obama is about to violate both the Constitution and international law by going to war without the consent of Congress or the UN Security Council simply “to make a point,” in the words of former State Department official Aaron David Miller. There is no defensive justification, no legal justification, no strategic justification, and no humanitarian justification. But you’d think administration officials would be able to fake it a little better.

Los Angeles Times:

One U.S. official who has been briefed on the options on Syria said he believed the White House would seek a level of intensity “just muscular enough not to get mocked” but not so devastating that it would prompt a response from Syrian allies Iran and Russia.

“They are looking at what is just enough to mean something, just enough to be more than symbolic,” he said.

So not only are we bombing another country “to make a point,” but we’re doing it in a way that ensures we won’t “get mocked.”

Can the case for for get any thinner?

Actually it can, if we just widen our lens to include some context. This McClatchy article is a worthwhile read: it explains that “morality as a motive in U.S. foreign policy is more contingent than absolute.” Genocide, international crimes, aggression, chemical weapons use – all of them are used selectively in order to justify U.S. foreign policy on wholly separate calculations. Let me flesh this out a bit…

Newly declassified CIA documents made headlines this week. They proved that the U.S. supported Saddam Hussein in his 1980s war against Iran with the knowledge that he was using chemical weapons indiscriminately on a near daily basis. Saddam killed far more people with chemical weapons than Assad (allegedly) has.

In the following decade, Saddam morphed into a bad guy. The United States imposed the worst economic sanctions on a single country in recent memory. This U.S.-led economic warfare directly led to the deaths of about 500,000 Iraqi children. Two UN envoys assigned to Iraq in the 1990s resigned in protest because of how horrible the sanctions were, one of them describing it as “genocidal.”

Then in 2003, the United States launched a war on Iraq under false pretenses. The invasion didn’t have a defensive justification, since Saddam didn’t pose even the remotest threat to America, and it didn’t have legal justification either since it wasn’t approved by the UN Security Council. By the most conservative estimates available, about 150,000 people were killed as a result. More reasonable estimates, published in peer-reviewed academic journals, put the number at closer to 600,000-700,000.

Those are three examples in the past three decades of U.S. policy in the Middle East that pull the rug out from under the Obama administration’s moralistic rationale for war against Syria’s Bashar al-Assad. All three demonstrate serious international crimes committed by Washington, all three with humanitarian costs far more severe than anything Assad has done.

So, really…where does America get off?

Update: In Al Jazeera, Rachel Shabi makes a similar point:

Why should military action be necessitated by outrage over chemical attacks? Was there a red line on chemical weapons when the US used depleted-uranium ammunition in Fallujah, Iraq? Was there a red line when Israel deployed white phosphorous in Gaza in 2008? Or when Saddam Hussein, then a western ally, gassed the Iranians and then his own people during the 1980s? This arbitrary and self-serving declaration of what’s acceptable is precisely what makes the US so lacking in credibility when it comes to preaching codes of warfare to the Middle East.




76 Responses to “Bombing Syria ‘Just Enough Not to Get Mocked,’ Or, Where Does America Get Off?”

  1. > where does America get off?

    At Henry Kissinger station?

  2. [...] Print This | Share This | Send a letter to the editor | Letters | Antiwar Forum [...]

  3. Too bad when there actually have been attempts to come up with (secular) codes for warfare, the U.S. has violated them all.

  4. Why aren't more Americans filled with outrage ? War has become a bad bedfellow that we curiously seem to cuddle rather than kick out. Is it a mental thing with people ? They are just Numb, or dumb ?

  5. Because their to busy watching reality TV. My own Mother said to me…if that stuff makes you so mad, then why do you read it. I tell her because somebody has to.

  6. The entire Afghan security forces depends entirely on US funds to pay for salaries, equipment, and training, If the US stops funding the Afghan army and police – that's 350,000 mostly armed people – then Afghanistan really is likely to fall apart, mainly along existing social fault lines and divisions. And it is high time Pakistan gives up its strategic depth policies since Afghanistan could possibly turn into a powder keg under loose cannons because of it, and negatively impact Pakistan's security. It is for these unstated reasons that the US will very likely continue a presence there. The Afghans will undoubtedly sign the bilateral strategic agreement – ask the US to stay post-2014 – and the US is eager to accommodate the request to occupy.

  7. Then in 2003, the United States launched a war on Iraq under false pretenses. The invasion didn’t have a defensive justification, since Saddam didn’t pose even the remotest threat to America, and it didn’t have legal justification either since it wasn’t approved by the UN Security Council.

  8. ….that September day in 2001 being the foundation of lies …and the world stands idly by…

  9. Another great example of innovation, I am glad to locate it. There are so several developers working on this segment but this is one of the best innovative idea ever. Thanks for sharing it here.

  10. seems to stipulate or is this just a statistical artifact within an aggregated narrative about women that's even harder to swallow

  11. This was both beautiful, and reminded me of one of the most ridiculous scenes in the history of ridiculousness from One Tree Hill <a herf="https://www.rebelmouse.com/boostyourbustjennybolton/">how do i make my breasts grow bigger<a/>

  12. This was a great review of the digital publishing models. This was really very interesting and fun to read.

  13. You have some really great posts and I feel I would be a good asset. If you ever want to take some of the load off, I'd love to write some material for your blog in exchange for a link back to mine. Please shoot me an email if interested. Thank you!

  14. That's pretty powerful stuff. I like the way your logic follows, and how you're able to put it into words with such a powerful post! I am enthralled

  15. I was working and suddenly I visits your site frequently and recommended it to me to read also. The writing style is superior and the content is relevant. Thanks for the insight you provide the readers!

  16. Now, we don’t recommend using this feature as an excuse to just go logging yourself into every computer you touch willy-nilly. Even with this “Mayday” option to log yourself out remotely, and the ability to delete posts that you didn’t authorize, you still don’t want to leave yourself open, even if it’s for a little while.
    best android apps

  17. Really impressed! Everything is very open and very clear clarification of issues. It contains truly information. Your website is very beneficial. Thanks for sharing

  18. That was a useful post from you to read on the downloadable versions of the Powerpoint wireframe stencils. It will definitely be helpful in integrating the mapping software and using it for other related issues in Powerpoint. Awaiting more useful updates from you.

  19. Genuinely amazed! Every thing can be quite available and incredibly apparent clarification involving difficulties. Its full of genuinely facts. Your internet site can be quite helpful. Many thanks for expressing.

  20. Really impressed! Everything is very open and very clear clarification of issues. It contains truly information. Your website is very beneficial. Thanks for sharing.

  21. I enjoyed this post very much, such a out standing post. Marketing is a complex thing and there is no proper formula but constant engagement and efforts are the key of success

  22. I enjoyed this post very much, such a out standing post. Marketing is a complex thing and there is no proper formula but constant engagement.

  23. Great article…keep up the good work :-)

  24. Great way to sample the canyon. Flies over the West Rim. See Guano Point and Eagle Point, as well as the Grand Canyon Skywalk. Perfect charter for large groupsHorseboxes

  25. This website has very good content. Thank you for the great article I did enjoyed reading it, I will be sure to bookmark your blog and definitely will come back from again flappybirdsgames.com

  26. I can't believe that this situation got so out of control. That said, I love this website. It is very informative and provides great insight to the entire situation. Thanks. graviola

  27. I agree with some of the comments above regarding how wonderful this site is. I think it is really awesome. I absolutely think it's great. keep up the good work on this site. z-code

  28. Not only is this an amazingly insightful website, it also has great commentary. In fact, that's what I love the most! click here

  29. Actually, this is sometimes more amazing than other times, but on the whole it is basically amazing all the time. I love it. nathan gold penny stock egghead review

  30. As I mentioned above, this is simply the most insightful of insightful sites on the world wide web i.e., the information superhighway. mind secrets

  31. When I was a child, I used to attend poetry classes a lot and poems would often grab me in a very visceral way. Basically, a deeply historical way and references to the blues continuum. manifestation

  32. Thanks a lot very much for the high quality and results-oriented help. I won’t think twice to endorse your blog post to anybody who wants and needs support about this area.
    <a href="http://www.cheapsmtp.info” target=”_blank”>www.cheapsmtp.info

  33. Very useful information. Thanks for sharing

  34. Like Russia, the United States has sovereignty, aspirations. Let's, however, the U.S. is a lesser evil than Russia.

  35. I won’t think twice to endorse your blog post to anybody who wants and needs support about this area.
    <a href="http://www.bastya-or.hu” target=”_blank”>www.bastya-or.hu

    Thanks a lot very much for the high quality and results-oriented help.
    <a href="http://www.parfumkucko.hu” target=”_blank”>www.parfumkucko.hu

    Thanks a lot very much for the high quality and results-oriented help. I won’t think twice to endorse your blog post to anybody who wants and needs support about this area.
    zarora.hu

    Wonderful article and very interesting.
    biztonsagos-adatmentes.hu

  36. Thanks a lot very much for the high quality and results-oriented help.
    <a href="http://www.parfumkucko.hu” target=”_blank”>www.parfumkucko.hu

  37. Great article. Powers of Russia and Americans need to let go. Stop butting always and everywhere …

  38. I like your post and everything you share with us is current and very informative, I want to bookmark the page so I can return here from you that you have done a fantastic job. I agree with you. This post is truly inspiring.
    londonsecretbabes.org

  39. great site, nice information, should be more sites like this, keep so !

  40. nice blog man, keep so!

  41. There is no defensive justification, no legal justification, no strategic justification, and no humanitarian justification. But you’d think administration officials would be able to fake it a little better.instant racing

  42. All three demonstrate serious international crimes committed by Washington, all three with humanitarian costs far more severe than anything Assad has done.which reviewers have covered

  43. great site, nice information, should be more sites like this, keep so ! I like your post and everything you share with us is current and very informative, I want to bookmark the page so I can return here from you that you have done a fantastic job

  44. There is no defensive justification, no legal justification, no strategic justification, and no humanitarian justification. But you’d think administration officials would be able to fake it a little better.First CNA Classes

  45. White mold, also known as Sclerotinia stem rot, is a disease that starts earlier in the season during flowering. The actual infection occurs on the senescing flower, which serves as a food source for the fungus, Giesler says.check it out

  46. Genocide, international crimes, aggression, chemical weapons use – all of them are used selectively in order to justify U.S. foreign policy on wholly separate calculations. Let me flesh this out a bit…Winston Kelly

  47. agree with some of the comments above regarding how wonderful this site is. I think it is really awesome. I absolutely think it's great. keep up the good work on this site malware

  48. Department official Aaron David Miller. There is no defensive justification, no legal justification, no strategic justification, and no humanitarian justification. But you’d think administration officials would be able to fake it a little better.waste disposal london

  49. So not only are we bombing another country “to make a point,” but we’re doing it in a way that ensures we won’t “get mocked.”sprout social media

  50. There is no defensive justification, no legal justification, no strategic justification, and no humanitarian justification. But you’d think administration officials would be able to fake it a little better.crunchbase.com

  51. I love this website. It is very informative and provides great insight to the entire situation. …

  52. So not only are we bombing another country “to make a point,” but we’re doing it in a way that ensures we won’t “get mocked.”mini servicing

  53. I agree with some of the comments above regarding how wonderful this site is. I think it is really awesome. I absolutely think it's great. keep up the good work on this site.Clash of clans game<a/>

  54. I enjoyed this post very much, such a out standing post. Marketing is a complex thing and there is no proper formula but constant engagement.Clash of clans online<a/>

  55. Even with this “Mayday” option to log yourself out remotely, and the ability to delete posts that you didn’t authorize, you still don’t want to leave yourself open, even if it’s for a little while. perth web development

  56. keep up the good work on this site…

  57. I agree with some of the comments above regarding how wonderful this site is. I think it is really awesome. I absolutely think it's great. keep up the good work on this site.“Deluxe Lashes”

  58. There is no defensive justification, no legal justification, no strategic justification, and no humanitarian justification. But you’d think administration officials would be able to fake it a little better.Skor Hari ini

  59. This arbitrary and self-serving declaration of what’s acceptable is precisely what makes the US so lacking in credibility when it comes to preaching codes of warfare to the Middle East.looking for more information

  60. Genocide, international crimes, aggression, chemical weapons use – all of them are used selectively in order to justify U.S. foreign policy on wholly separate calculations. Let me flesh this out a bit…http://frendiode.newsvine.com/_news/2014/05/14/23

  61. Bashar al-Assad. All three demonstrate serious international crimes committed by Washington, all three with humanitarian costs far more severe than anything Assad has done.Marnie Bennett

  62. I enjoyed this post very much, such a out standing post. Marketing is a complex thing and there is no proper formula but constant engagement and efforts are the key of success .elo boost

  63. nice blog man, keep so!

  64. nice website man, thanks for your information !

  65. There is no defensive justification, no legal justification, no strategic justification, and no humanitarian justification. But you’d think administration officials would be able to fake it a little better.http://mashable.com/people/bradreifler/new

  66. Another great example of innovation, I am glad to locate it. There are so several developers working on this segment but this is one of the best innovative idea ever. Thanks for sharing it herevw repair orange county

  67. the consent of Congress or the UN Security Council simply “to make a point,” in the words of former State Department official Aaron David Miller. There is no defensive justi http://www.clalit.co.il/sefer/pages/ClinicDetails

  68. “A person may use his fundamental right to communicate whatever he likes, but the people like his point as per their personal choice only and not necessarily that which is always fundamentally right.”

  69. In the following decade, Saddam morphed into a bad guy. Wholesale Snapback Hats

  70. I really liked the font you've chose to use in this article. Could I please get the name of that font? I wanted to use it in my project now. Thanks very much sac lancel

  71. “Reality doesn't impress me. I only believe in intoxication, in ecstasy, and when ordinary life shackles me, I escape, one way or another. No more walls.”

  72. “Darkness cannot drive out darkness: only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate: only love can do that.”

  73. “he thinks too highly of me, places me on a pedestal i've never deserved.”

  74. “Dwell on the beauty of life. Watch the stars, and see yourself running with them.”

  75. defensive justification, since Saddam didn’t pose even the remotest threat to America, and it didn’t have legal justification either since it wasn’t approved by the UN Security Council. http://sextonbender.com/

  76. “To be a Christian means to forgive the inexcusable because God has forgiven the inexcusable in you.”