The Truth About Cease-fire Violations Between Israel and Gaza

John Glaser, February 06, 2014

Here’s how the relationship between Israel and Gaza works: successive “cease-fires” are repeatedly adopted and continuously violated, leading more often to skirmishes than to lulls in violence. Israel bombs Gaza with airstrikes, Gaza shoots rockets into Israel. Then a new “cease-fire” is imposed.

If you were to ask anyone, from a casual observer to a ‘well-informed’ media commentator, which side violates the ceasefires more often, they would almost surely say Gaza. The newspapers and network news media constantly inform the American people when a rocket is hurled from Gaza into Israel. Both Israeli and American politicians cite this phenomenon in speeches and press conferences to justify Israel’s continuing economic blockade of Gaza, among other things. With regard to the Gaza situation, practically all we hear about is rockets.

In an ongoing study of violence between Israel and Gaza, The Jerusalem Fund, a non-profit in Washington, D.C., has catalogued cease-fire violations on either side. The principal finding is as follows: “Palestinian launches have been rare and sporadic and occurred almost always after successive instances of Israeli cease-fire violations.” Despite this, in the diplomacy on Mid-East peace, we invariably hear about Israel’s security concerns, while that of the Palestinians’ is hardly mentioned.

Here is a graph of the findings:

[Click to Enlarge]

Yousef Munayyer, Executive Director of The Jerusalem Fund, explains how it typically works: Israel can “fire into Gaza without accountability, provoke a reaction and then claim self-defense.” See here for his explanation of the methodology.

I have written about previous cases in which Israel breaks the cease-fire with bombings, shootings, or territorial incursions, and then uses the retaliation from Gaza as a justification to launch a deeper bombing campaign here and here.

Israel violates the cease-fires more often, bombs Gaza more times than Gaza rockets Israel, and kills more Palestinians than Palestinians kill Israelis. But these findings are not what is striking. What is striking about this is that almost everybody believes the opposite of the reality. Here’s Munayyer with more on that:

So how have these cease-fire dynamics been covered? We’ve tracked New York Times coverage of the cease-fire during this period. The New York Times is representative of the mainstream and extremely important for shaping public discourse on events and thus an important window into broader mainstream coverage. The Times also has multiple reporters covering these events including a bureau in Jerusalem and a correspondent in Gaza. Finally, we simply can’t track everything so the Times, with its easily searchable history, is an effective example to use.

Of the nearly 120 Israeli cease-fire violations during this period the New York Times reported on 17 of them. Additionally, most of these stories (eleven) came either during the first week of the cease-fire, when the issue was still fresh in readers’ minds, or since the escalation on December 20th. That means for the bulk of this period, during which Israel committed 87 cease-fire violations and causing some 91 Palestinian casualties over nearly a one year period there were only six stories on the topic. This represents a systematic failure to cover Israeli cease-fire violations.

Making matters worse is the way events are covered in the rare instances they are covered. In most cases, Israeli actions are described as a response to Palestinian actions. So while most Israeli cease-fire violations are not covered at all, those that are are explained as justified retaliation. Thus the reader is completely misled about the dynamics of fire, why the cease-fire is threatened and exactly what is going on in and around Gaza.

The biggest challenge to the cease-fire agreement is persistent Israeli violation and the lack of any accountability for them. The politics of the Gaza Strip are complex. Israel says it wants Hamas to control projectile fire from other factions and yet it persistently violates the truce putting Hamas in a position of having to defend Israel’s violations. By targeting groups other than Hamas and by expecting Hamas to crack down on their responses, Israel is playing a dangerous and deadly game of divide and conquer in Gaza that will likely lead to the unraveling of the cease-fire. Once again, Israel has proven security is not its aim, subjugation is.

More here.




17 Responses to “The Truth About Cease-fire Violations Between Israel and Gaza”

  1. Violence never starts with the oppressed since the oppression itself is violence. This narrative of Israel “defending itself” has been a recurrent lie since before Israel was a state. It is well documented that before Arab countries attacked Israel in’48 nearly 500,000 Palestinians had been ethnically cleansed using mass rape and murder to terrorise. Further and amazingly many people believe that Arab countries attacked Israel in ’67 when in fact Israel attacked Egypt on June 4.

  2. Your article turns reality upside down and is complete disinformation.
    Stories about cease fire violations usually read in the press as last-first with the Gazans being painted as the victim and only later in the article does it mention that Israel's attack is in response to a Gazan rocket.

  3. Amazeballs are you on planet earth? The article clearly stated that Israel is the first to break the ceasefire which the mainstream media ignored. Hamas in response to the Israeli aggression launched rockets into Israeli territory. Just Google the damn thing. "Israeli violations."

  4. Eventually these stolen lands will revert back to its owners no amount of money will change this.

  5. The state of Israel is a violation of ever law in itself. Established on a mere myth, on stolen property with the help of brutal terror and justified by lies and liers like you.

  6. Shill Alert Shill Alert! Paid Israeli shill from Planet Apartheid haunting the halls of Antiwar.com.

  7. Worst part of my dream is, them Israelies will all relocated into USA

  8. Amazing Balls: You would kick me in the face and then point to my teethmarks on your boots as proof of my aggression.

  9. You should respect to israelis, whatever she does (an anti-human rights said)

  10. Israels creation was a violation of all the human and decent codes.

  11. There is no trouble from ex SA apartheid lovers in any Western country. The same is true for Israeli apartheid lovers who move there. You're not their niggers. donthomson1@hotmail.com

  12. This is very well done. I cited it, and then later quoted it with credit in Wash Post comments for an article about rockets. The response was incredulity. They couldn't imagine it, they were deep in the pain of denial faced by fact. I hope you don't mind my using it for that. Thanks.

  13. Israel causes Palestinians to launch rockets into Israel by forcing them off their land, making settlements and using water from their homes to irrigate their farms. If Israel were the most powerful nation in the nineteenth century, the USA would use Israeli taxes to displace Native Americans.

  14. Excellent and well-worded observation, sir.

  15. Get lost. You have been reported.

  16. Thank you for another great article. Where else could anyone get that kind of information in such a perfect way of writing? I have a presentation next week Rgopoker.com Bandar Judi Poker Situs Poker Online Terpercaya

  17. […] Translation:  Israel intends to start a war.  While Israel has the right to violate the air space and attack its neighbors at will, they have no right to strike back.  Thusly, expect Israeli “retaliation” for what will be a response to Israeli attacks.  AS usual – the “they hit us back first” defense Israel and its revolting 5th colum… […]